Smoking and drinking among college students: “It's a package deal”
Open accessAbstract
Background This paper reports on qualitative research on smoking in contexts associated with drinking among college students. Although a plethora of survey research has shown a positive association between smoking and alcohol use, little attention has been given to the utility functions of these co-occurring behaviors. Methods Data are drawn from semi-structured interviews with college freshmen at a large Mid-western university in the U.S. (n=35). In addition, eleven focus groups with fraternity and sorority members were conducted (n=70). Interviews and focus groups focused on a range of issues including current smoking behavior, reasons for smoking, and smoking and drinking. Results A review of qualitative responses reveals that smoking served multiple utility functions for this population including (1) facilitating social interaction across gender, (2) allowing one to structure time and space at a party, (3) enabling "party" smokers to smoke with fewer negative side effects, and (4) helping to calm one down when drunk. Conclusions Whereas smoking was stigmatized during the context of one's everyday life as a student, at parties while consuming alcohol, smoking was viewed as normative and socially acceptable. Preventive interventions are needed on college campus that target co-substance use and address widespread misperceptions about the harm of tobacco use and addiction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nichter et al. (2010) found fraternity houses were common party locations for freshmen males and females during their first several months on campus, despite freshmen not yet being members.
“Nichter, Nichter, Carkoglu, and Lloyd-Richardson (2010) found similar results using focus group methodology.The researchers found fraternity houses were common party locations for freshmen males and females during their first several months on campus, despite the fact that freshmen are not yet members.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nichter et al. (2010)
Nichter et al. (2010) participants estimated actual smokers at 10% and smoking at parties at 60%-70%.
“Participants differentiated between actual smokers, which they estimated at 10%, and smoking at parties, which they estimated to be at 60%-70%.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nichter et al. (2010)
Nichter et al. (2010) found that upperclass fraternity members made a perceptual distinction between being a smoker and smoking at parties.
“Focus groups among upperclass fraternity members showed a perceptual distinction between being a smoker and smoking at parties.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Nichter et al. (2010)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Nichter, M., Nichter, M., Carkoglu, A., & Lloyd-Richardson, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- ORCID
- Nichter, Mark
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-20
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985315498
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dogus University Institutional Repository (Dogus University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Keywords
- university students, smoking, alcohol consumption, co-occurring substance use, tobacco use, social norms, smoking stigma, smoking prevention
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Attitude, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Smoking, Social Class, Social Environment, Social Facilitation, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review