Cited by 20Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMedical Coding and Health Information

Concordance between self-reports and archival records of physician visits: A case–control study comparing individuals with and without alcohol use disorders in the community

Open access
Glass, Joseph E., Bucholz, Kathleen K.·2011·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Objective The accuracy of self-reported healthcare use among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD) has been questioned. The present study attempts to compare the accuracy of self-reported physician visits for individuals who differ with respect to their history of AUDs. Methods Our data source was a 14-year follow-up of individuals interviewed at the St. Louis site of the 1981-1983 Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA). We used a case-control design (n=237) to compare the accuracy of self-reports among ECA participants with stably diagnosed AUDs (cases; n=75) to two comparison groups: those with problem/very heavy drinking (n=81) and those unaffected by alcohol (n=81). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) described the concordance between self-reports and archival records of physician visits in the prior six months. We used multinomial logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with under-reporting and over-reporting, and zero-truncated Poisson regression to identify characteristics associated with discordance severity. Results Self-reports of cases had substantial concordance with physician records (ICC=0.74, CI=0.61-0.83). As compared to cases, those with problem/very heavy drinking had a significantly higher ICC, and those who were unaffected by alcohol had a significantly lower ICC. However, differences in concordance disappeared when using regression models that adjusted for factors known to affect the accuracy of self-reported healthcare use. Utilization frequency was a strong predictor of inaccurate reporting. Conclusions These findings suggest AUD status may not independently affect the accuracy of self-reports. Counts of physician visits for those with AUD may be considered accurate when utilization frequency is low.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.021

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dillman DA 2000 Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method Wiley New York
  2. McGraw KO Wong SP 1996 Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psychol Methods 1 30 46
  3. Wolinsky FD Miller TR An H Geweke JF Wallace RB Wright KB Chrischilles EA Liu L Pavlik CB Cook EA Ohsfeldt RL Richardson KK Rosenthal GE 2007 Hospital episodes and physician visits: the concordance between self-reports and medicare claims Med Care 45 300 307 17496713 PMC1904836

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glass, J. E., & Bucholz, K. K.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Glass, Joseph E.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
116
Issue
1-3
Pages
57-63
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985648751
Cited by
20
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11998, AA 12640, R01AA010333, P60AA011998, R01AA012640, AA 10333)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH019960)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-14363, R01DA014363, T32DA015035)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
alcoholism, physician visits, self-report accuracy, underreporting, overreporting, archival sources, heavy drinking, health care utilization, Epidemiologic Catchment Area study
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cognition Disorders, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Physicians, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Residence Characteristics, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Disease Progression, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review