Poly-tobacco use among adults in 44 countries during 2008-2012: evidence for an integrative and comprehensive approach in tobacco control
Abstract
Introduction The concurrent use of multiple tobacco products (i.e., poly-tobacco use) might hinder efforts to reduce overall tobacco use, particularly considering that use of some non-cigarette tobacco products may be popular in some regions due to social, cultural, or economic reasons. This study assessed poly-tobacco use patterns among persons aged ≥15 years old from 44 countries. Methods Data from 44 countries in all six World Health Organization regions were obtained from the 2008 to 2012 Global Adult Tobacco Surveys (n=19 countries), and the Special Eurobarometer 385 (77.1) survey, 2012 (n=25 countries). Correlates of poly-tobacco use were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analyses (p Results Overall prevalence of poly-tobacco use ranged from 0.8% (Mexico) to 11.9% (Denmark). In 28 countries, 20% or more of current smokers of manufactured cigarettes concurrently used at least one other tobacco product and this proportion was highest in India (66.2%) and lowest in Argentina (4.4%). After adjusting for other factors, the likelihood of being a poly-tobacco user among all respondents was lower among females (aOR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.08-0.11), and among respondents from upper-middle-income (aOR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66), and lower-middle-income countries (aOR=0.64; 95% CI: 0.51-0.81) compared to high-income countries. Increased likelihood of poly-tobacco use was observed among respondents from the South-East Asian region compared to those from the European region (aOR…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of multiple nicotine products is frequent, with the most common combination being cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
“Use of multiple nicotine products is frequent, with the most common combination being cigarettes and e-cigarettes (Agaku et al., 2014;Kasza et al., 2017).”
From Use of e-cigarettes associated with lower sperm counts in a cross-sectional study of young men from the general population (2020) · cites this paper as Agaku et al., 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holmboe, S. A., Priskorn, L., Jensen, T. K., Skakkebaek, N. E., Andersson, A.-M., & Jørgensen, N. (2020) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa089 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Agaku, I. T., Filippidis, F. T., Vardavas, C. I., Odukoya, O. O., Awopegba, A. J., Ayo-Yusuf, O. A., & Connolly, G. N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Lagos (NG)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agaku, Israel T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 60-70
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050380049
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- polytobacco use, non-cigarette tobacco products, tobacco control, cigarette smoking, WHO regions, Global Adult Tobacco Survey
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Tobacco Use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review