Treatment for substance use disorders in pregnant women: Motivators and barriers
Abstract
Background Pregnancy is a unique opportunity to provide broad and necessary medical care for women- including treatment for Substance Use Disorders (SUD). The standard of care for SUD in pregnant women is treatment at a comprehensive care facility. There is little existing qualitative research exploring what brings pregnant women with SUD to treatment and what barriers to treatment exist for this population. This study explored women's self-reported reasons for pursuing treatment or hesitating to do so. Methods This qualitative study used interviews to explore common factors that motivate pregnant women with SUD to seek comprehensive care during pregnancy and common hesitations/ barriers to treatment. The study population included 20 women in treatment at a comprehensive care facility for pregnant and parenting women at Johns Hopkins. Participants volunteered to do interviews which were recorded and transcribed for analysis. Results Interviews revealed several major themes in motivators to seek treatment: readiness to stop using, concern for the baby's health, concern about custody of the baby or other children, wanting to escape violent environments or homelessness, and seeking structure. Barriers to treatment included fear of loss of custody, not wanting to be away from children/partner, concern about stigma or privacy, and lack of childcare and transportation. Conclusions This study revealed common motivators to seek treatment and barriers to treatment for pregnant women w…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregnancy presents an ideal PTSD treatment window for this vulnerable and otherwise difficult-to-engage population.
“Marked by increased engagement in care, reduced or halted substance use, and increased motivation for psychosocial treatment [15], pregnancy presents an ideal PTSD treatment window for this vulnerable and otherwise difficult-to-engage population.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- Frazer, Z., McConnell, K., & Jansson, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frazer, Zane
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 205
- Pages
- 107652
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981781371
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- substance use disorders, pregnant women, treatment motivation, barriers to treatment, prenatal care, stigma, homelessness, parental substance use, maternal and child health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Motivation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Pregnant People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review