The predictive capacity of AUDIT and AUDIT-C among adolescents in a one-year follow-up study
Open accessAbstract
Aim The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been validated for use with adolescents to screen their harmful alcohol consumption. How well AUDIT or its derivative consumption version AUDIT-C predicts the development of problematic alcohol use among adolescents remains unknown. The aim of our study was to examine the predictive capacity of AUDIT and AUDIT-C among adolescents in a one-year follow-up.Methods Finnish adolescents (N = 337) were examined at baseline with AUDIT and one year later with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children - Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) interview to assess alcohol problem use. Test characteristics and regression models were analyzed in predicting alcohol problem use.Results The sensitivity of AUDIT (cut-off ≥5) was 0.809 and specificity 0.621 in predicting alcohol problem use among adolescents one year later. The positive test posterior probability was 0.51. For those who screened negative at baseline, the positive test posterior probability was 0.13. With AUDIT-C (cut-off ≥3), the posterior probabilities were 0.47 and 0.12, respectively (sensitivity 0.855, specificity 0.529). The odds ratio was 6.95 for those screening positive with AUDIT and 6.59 with AUDIT-C at baseline to have alcohol problem use one year later.Conclusions AUDIT has utility in screening youth at risk for developing alcohol problem use. It has significant predictive capacity in detecting risk especially among adolescents with depression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AUDIT-C is the best practice tool currently recommended for alcohol screening in the general population and performs well for adolescents and across ethnic groups.
“The AUDIT-C is a shortened version of the AUDIT [47], which is the best practice tool currently recommended for alcohol screening in the general population and performs well for adolescents [48,49] and across ethnic groups [50].”
From Feasibility and Acceptability of the Aboriginal and Islander Mental Health Initiative for Youth App: Nonrandomized Pilot With First Nations Young People (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Previous research has demonstrated that changes in AUDIT-C scores over one year do reflect changes in drinking for adults and can predict future problematic drinking in adolescents.
“Previous research has demonstrated that changes in AUDIT-C scores over one year do reflect changes in drinking for adults and can predict future problematic drinking in adolescents [48,56].”
From Feasibility and Acceptability of the Aboriginal and Islander Mental Health Initiative for Youth App: Nonrandomized Pilot With First Nations Young People (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Liskola, J., Haravuori, H., Lindberg, N., Kiviruusu, O., Niemelä, S., Karlsson, L., & Marttunen, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
- University of Turku (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Liskola, Joni
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 218
- Pages
- 108424
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3107198602
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- innish Foundation for Psychiatric Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- auditing, AUDIT-C, adolescents, alcohol abuse, predictive validity, depression, screening cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, at-risk youth
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review