Cited by 23Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The predictive capacity of AUDIT and AUDIT-C among adolescents in a one-year follow-up study

Open access
Liskola, Joni, Haravuori, Henna, Lindberg, Nina, Kiviruusu, Olli, Niemelä, Solja, Karlsson, Linnea, Marttunen, Mauri·2021·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Aim The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been validated for use with adolescents to screen their harmful alcohol consumption. How well AUDIT or its derivative consumption version AUDIT-C predicts the development of problematic alcohol use among adolescents remains unknown. The aim of our study was to examine the predictive capacity of AUDIT and AUDIT-C among adolescents in a one-year follow-up.Methods Finnish adolescents (N = 337) were examined at baseline with AUDIT and one year later with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children - Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) interview to assess alcohol problem use. Test characteristics and regression models were analyzed in predicting alcohol problem use.Results The sensitivity of AUDIT (cut-off ≥5) was 0.809 and specificity 0.621 in predicting alcohol problem use among adolescents one year later. The positive test posterior probability was 0.51. For those who screened negative at baseline, the positive test posterior probability was 0.13. With AUDIT-C (cut-off ≥3), the posterior probabilities were 0.47 and 0.12, respectively (sensitivity 0.855, specificity 0.529). The odds ratio was 6.95 for those screening positive with AUDIT and 6.59 with AUDIT-C at baseline to have alcohol problem use one year later.Conclusions AUDIT has utility in screening youth at risk for developing alcohol problem use. It has significant predictive capacity in detecting risk especially among adolescents with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108424

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 23

Authors
Liskola, J., Haravuori, H., Lindberg, N., Kiviruusu, O., Niemelä, S., Karlsson, L., & Marttunen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Liskola, Joni
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
218
Pages
108424
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3107198602
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
innish Foundation for Psychiatric Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
auditing, AUDIT-C, adolescents, alcohol abuse, predictive validity, depression, screening cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, at-risk youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review