A qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs in Vancouver, British Columbia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking unregulated drugs has increased substantially in British Columbia. Intersecting with the ongoing overdose crisis, drug smoking-related overdose fatalities have correspondingly surged. However, little is known about the experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs accessing the toxic drug supply. This study explores perceptions and experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 31 people who smoke drugs. Interviews covered a range of topics including overdose experience. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes related to participant perceptions and experiences of smoking-related overdose. RESULTS: Some participants perceived smoking drugs to pose lower overdose risk relative to injecting drugs. Participants reported smoking-related overdose experiences, including from underestimating the potency of drugs, the cross-contamination of stimulants with opioids, and responding to smoking-related overdose events. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the impact the unpredictable, unregulated, and toxic drug supply is having on people who smoke drugs, both among people who use opioids, and among those who primarily use stimulants. Efforts to address smoking-related overdose could benefit from expanding supervised smoking sites, working with people who use drugs to disseminate accurate knowledge around smoking-related overdose risk, and offering a smokable alternative to the unpredictable drug supply.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Alberta Health. (2019). Opioid-related deaths in Alberta in 2017: Review of medical examiner data https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/f9912915-bd4f-4b57-93bf-2a963cb99038/resource/a2857ab6-6663-491c-b9df-686e348bb456/download/070519-mechart-review-final.pdf
- Kral AH, Lambdin BH, Browne EN, Wenger LD, Bluthenthal RN, Zibbell JE, Davidson PJ, 2021a. Transition from injecting opioids to smoking fentanyl in San Francisco, California. Drug Alcohol Depend 227, 109003 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109003. 34482046 PMC10790652 · DOI
- Authors
- Ivsins, A., Bonn, M., McNeil, R., Boyd, J., & Kerr, T.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ivsins, Andrew
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 258
- Pages
- 111275
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11088499
- OpenAlex
- W4393320552
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (20R74326)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 DA044181-06A1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- unregulated drug supply, stimulants, opioids, cross-contamination, drug users, Vancouver
- MeSH terms
- Adult, British Columbia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Illicit Drugs, Qualitative Research, Drug Users, Young Adult, Drug Overdose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review