Cited by 949HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach

Rhodes, Tim·2009·International Journal of Drug Policy

Abstract

A 'risk environment' framework promotes an understanding of harm, and harm reduction, as a matter of 'contingent causation'. Harm is contingent upon social context, comprising interactions between individuals and environments. There is a momentum of interest in understanding how the relations between individuals and environments impact on the production and reduction of drug harms, and this is reflected by broader debates in the social epidemiology, political economy, and sociology of health. This essay maps some of these developments, and a number of challenges. These include: social epidemiological approaches seeking to capture the socially constructed and dynamic nature of individual-environment interactions; political-economic approaches giving sufficient attention to how risk is situated differentially in local contexts, and to the role of agency and experience; understanding how public health as well as harm reduction discourses act as sites of 'governmentality' in risk subjectivity; and focusing on the logics of everyday habits and practices as a means to understanding how structural risk environments are incorporated into experience. Overall, the challenge is to generate empirical and theoretical work which encompasses both 'determined' and 'productive' relations of risk across social structures and everyday practices. A risk environment approach brings together multiple resources and methods in social science, and helps frame a 'social science for harm reduction'.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 133 references

3 of the 133 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pearce, 1998, Back to the future in epidemiology and public health, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 643

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 949

Metadata

Authors
Rhodes, T.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Tim
Venue
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
193-201
ISSN
0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110101976
Cited by
948
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 33
FWCI
20.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
risk environment, drug-related harm, harm reduction, individual-environment interaction, social epidemiology, political economy of health, governmentality, everyday practices, structural risk, public health discourse
MeSH terms
Humans, Politics, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Social Problems, Socioeconomic Factors, Substance-Related Disorders, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review