Cited by 146Psychedelics and Drug StudiesReligious Freedom and DiscriminationCriminal Law and Policy

Ayahuasca and the process of regulation in Brazil and internationally: Implications and challenges

Labate, Beatriz Caiuby, Feeney, Kevin·2012·International Journal of Drug Policy

Abstract

Background This paper provides a summary and analysis of the regulation of ayahuasca in Brazil, from its prohibition in the mid-eighties to the recent adoption of CONAD's (Conselho Nacional de Políticas sobre Drogas) 2010 Resolution, which established a set of rules, norms and ethical principles to be applied to religious and ritual uses of ayahuasca. Brazil's regulatory process is used as a starting point to explore emerging international regulatory themes as various nations respond to the global expansion of the Santo Daime and UDV (União do Vegetal) ayahuasca religions. Methods The text reviews the primary legislative and court documents, academic literature, as well as solicited expert opinions. Results Three prominent themes have emerged internationally. The first concerns the scope of international treaties regarding plant-based psychoactive substances, as well as the responsibilities of individual nations to adhere to said treaties. The second concerns the scope of religious liberty and how to determine religious legitimacy. The final theme addresses the potential dangers of ayahuasca to health and public safety. Conclusion Over the past 20 years the Brazilian ayahuasca religions have established a global presence, with congregations in the USA, Canada, Japan, South Africa, Australia, and throughout Europe and Latin America. As a result, many nations are faced with the predicament of balancing the interests of these religious minorities with the international "war on d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.06.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 146

Authors
Labate, B. C., & Feeney, K.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Labate, Beatriz Caiuby
Venue
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
154-161
ISSN
0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051579023
Cited by
146
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
ayahuasca, drug regulation, Santo Daime, União do Vegetal, ayahuasca religions, religious freedom, international drug treaties, ritual drug use, war on drugs, public health and safety
MeSH terms
Brazil, Drug and Narcotic Control, Humans, International Cooperation, Plant Extracts, Psychotropic Drugs, Religion, Banisteriopsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review