Ayahuasca and the process of regulation in Brazil and internationally: Implications and challenges
Abstract
Background This paper provides a summary and analysis of the regulation of ayahuasca in Brazil, from its prohibition in the mid-eighties to the recent adoption of CONAD's (Conselho Nacional de Políticas sobre Drogas) 2010 Resolution, which established a set of rules, norms and ethical principles to be applied to religious and ritual uses of ayahuasca. Brazil's regulatory process is used as a starting point to explore emerging international regulatory themes as various nations respond to the global expansion of the Santo Daime and UDV (União do Vegetal) ayahuasca religions. Methods The text reviews the primary legislative and court documents, academic literature, as well as solicited expert opinions. Results Three prominent themes have emerged internationally. The first concerns the scope of international treaties regarding plant-based psychoactive substances, as well as the responsibilities of individual nations to adhere to said treaties. The second concerns the scope of religious liberty and how to determine religious legitimacy. The final theme addresses the potential dangers of ayahuasca to health and public safety. Conclusion Over the past 20 years the Brazilian ayahuasca religions have established a global presence, with congregations in the USA, Canada, Japan, South Africa, Australia, and throughout Europe and Latin America. As a result, many nations are faced with the predicament of balancing the interests of these religious minorities with the international "war on d…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Labate, B. C., & Feeney, K.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Washington State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Labate, Beatriz Caiuby
- Venue
- International Journal of Drug Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-161
- ISSN
- 0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051579023
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- ayahuasca, drug regulation, Santo Daime, União do Vegetal, ayahuasca religions, religious freedom, international drug treaties, ritual drug use, war on drugs, public health and safety
- MeSH terms
- Brazil, Drug and Narcotic Control, Humans, International Cooperation, Plant Extracts, Psychotropic Drugs, Religion, Banisteriopsis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review