Cited by 41HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskIntramuscular injections and effectsTattoo and Body Piercing Complications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Not in the vein: “missed hits”, subcutaneous and intramuscular injections and associated harms among people who inject psychoactive drugs in Bristol, United Kingdom

Open access
Hope, V.D., Parry, J.V., Ncube, F., Hickman, M.·2016·International Journal of Drug Policy

Abstract

Background The extent of intentional or accidental subcutaneous and intramuscular injections and the factors associated with these have rarely been studied among people who inject drugs, yet these may play an important role in the acquisition bacterial infections. This study describes the extent of these, and in particular the factors and harms associated with accidental subcutaneous and intramuscular injections (i.e. 'missed hits').Methods People who inject drugs were recruited using respondent driven sampling. Weighted data was examined using bivariate analyses and logistic regression.Results The participants mean age was 33 years (31% aged under 30-years), 28% were women, and the mean time since first injection was 12 years (N=329). During the preceding three months, 97% had injected heroin, 71% crack-cocaine, and 16% amphetamines; 36% injected daily. Overall, 99% (325) reported that they aimed to inject intravenously; only three aimed to inject subcutaneously and one intramuscularly. Of those that aimed to inject intravenously, 56% (181) reported ever missing a vein (for 51 this occurred more than four times month on average). Factors associated with 'missed hits' suggested that these were the consequence of poor vascular access, injection technique and/or hygiene. 'Missed hits' were twice as common among those reporting sores/open wounds, abscesses, or redness, swelling and tenderness at injection sites.Conclusion Intentional subcutaneous and intramuscular injections are rare in this sample. 'Missed hits' are common and appear to be associated with poor injection practice. Interventions are required to reduce risk through improving injecting practice and hygiene.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.11.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 41

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Anonymous, 2015, Botulism among people who inject drugs – Update, HPS Weekly Report, 49, 189

Metadata

Authors
Hope, V. D., Parry, J. V., Ncube, F., & Hickman, M.
Affiliations
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Hope, V.D.
Venue
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
28
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173133423
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10023, RP-DG-0610-10055)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023233/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications
Keywords
people who inject drugs, subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, injection technique, heroin, crack cocaine, bacterial infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacterial Infections, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review