The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Not in the vein: “missed hits”, subcutaneous and intramuscular injections and associated harms among people who inject psychoactive drugs in Bristol, United Kingdom
Open accessAbstract
Background The extent of intentional or accidental subcutaneous and intramuscular injections and the factors associated with these have rarely been studied among people who inject drugs, yet these may play an important role in the acquisition bacterial infections. This study describes the extent of these, and in particular the factors and harms associated with accidental subcutaneous and intramuscular injections (i.e. 'missed hits').Methods People who inject drugs were recruited using respondent driven sampling. Weighted data was examined using bivariate analyses and logistic regression.Results The participants mean age was 33 years (31% aged under 30-years), 28% were women, and the mean time since first injection was 12 years (N=329). During the preceding three months, 97% had injected heroin, 71% crack-cocaine, and 16% amphetamines; 36% injected daily. Overall, 99% (325) reported that they aimed to inject intravenously; only three aimed to inject subcutaneously and one intramuscularly. Of those that aimed to inject intravenously, 56% (181) reported ever missing a vein (for 51 this occurred more than four times month on average). Factors associated with 'missed hits' suggested that these were the consequence of poor vascular access, injection technique and/or hygiene. 'Missed hits' were twice as common among those reporting sores/open wounds, abscesses, or redness, swelling and tenderness at injection sites.Conclusion Intentional subcutaneous and intramuscular injections are rare in this sample. 'Missed hits' are common and appear to be associated with poor injection practice. Interventions are required to reduce risk through improving injecting practice and hygiene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“vesicants) are present in parenteral drugs users, in which progressive micro-vascular degradation have been described, and associated to more serious morbidity including vascular disease.53”
From Defining risk factors associated with difficult peripheral venous Cannulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Anonymous, 2015, Botulism among people who inject drugs – Update, HPS Weekly Report, 49, 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Hope, V. D., Parry, J. V., Ncube, F., & Hickman, M.
- Affiliations
- Public Health England (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hope, V.D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Drug Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 83-90
- ISSN
- 0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173133423
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10023, RP-DG-0610-10055)
- Medical Research Council (MR/K023233/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications
- Keywords
- people who inject drugs, subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, injection technique, heroin, crack cocaine, bacterial infection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bacterial Infections, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review