The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to enhance testing, linkage to care and treatment uptake for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND The burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is escalating among people who inject drugs (PWID), yet testing and treatment remains suboptimal. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to enhance HCV testing, linkage to care, and treatment uptake among PWID. METHODS A systematic literature search of Medline (Ovid 1946 - present), Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, Clinical Trials Registry, and Web of Science was conducted covering interventional studies published before 20 July 2016. Studies evaluating interventions to enhance HCV testing, linkage to care or treatment among PWID were included. Data from included studies was extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer with disagreements discussed until consensus was reached. Relative risk ratios and corresponding confidence intervals were generated for studies included in analysis. RESULTS After adjusting for duplicates, 10,116 records were identified. A total of 14 studies were included for analysis, of which 57% were randomised controlled trials. Interventions to enhance HCV testing included on-site testing with pre-test counselling and education; and dried blood spot testing. Interventions to enhance linkage to care included facilitated referral for HCV assessment and scheduling of specialist appointments for clients. Interventions to enhance HCV treatment uptake included integrated HCV care, drug use and psychiatric services delivered by a multidisciplinary team with case management services, with or without non-invasive liver disease assessment. All studies were conducted in the interferon treatment era and there were no studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS In the direct acting antiviral treatment era, well-designed studies evaluating interventions to enhance a simplified care cascade are crucial in facilitating treatment scale-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 · Cited by 20,329
Ho, S. B., Bräu, N., Cheung, R., Liu, L., Sanchez, C., Sklar, M., Phelps, T. E., Marcus, S. G., Wasil, M. M., Tisi, A., et al. (2015) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.022 · Cited by 118
Rosenberg, S. D., Goldberg, R. W., Dixon, L. B., Wolford, G. L., Slade, E. P., Himelhoch, S., Gallucci, G., Potts, W., Tapscott, S., & Welsh, C. J. (2010) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.9.885 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Bajis, S., Dore, G. J., Hajarizadeh, B., Cunningham, E. B., Maher, L., & Grebely, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Drug Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 34-46
- ISSN
- 0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2744191372
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interventions to enhance testing, linkage to care and treatment uptake for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.002
- The paper
- Bajis, S., Dore, G. J., Hajarizadeh, B., Cunningham, E. B., Maher, L., & Grebely, J. (2017). Interventions to enhance testing, linkage to care and treatment uptake for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs: A systematic review. International Journal of Drug Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.