Cited by 160Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Fentanyl shock: The changing geography of overdose in the United States

Zoorob, Michael·2019·International Journal of Drug Policy

Abstract

Background Rapid increases in drug overdose deaths in the United States since 2014 have been highly regionally stratified, with the largest increases occurring in the eastern and northeastern states. By contrast, many western states saw overdose deaths plateau. This paper shows how the differential influx of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues in the drug supply has reshaped the geography and demography of the overdose crisis in the United States. Methods Using all state lab drug seizures obtained by Freedom of Information Act request, I analyze the regionally distinctive presence of fentanyl in the US drug supply with descriptive plots and statistical models. Main analyses explore state-year overdose trends using two-way fixed effects ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and two-stage least squares regression (2SLS) instrumenting for fentanyl exposure with state-longitude times a linear trend. Results First, fentanyl exposure is highly correlated with geography and only weakly explained by overdose rates prior to 2014. States in the east (higher degrees longitude) are much more heavily affected. Second, fentanyl exposure exhibits a statistically significant and important effect on overdose mortality, with model-predicted deaths broadly consistent with official death statistics. Third, fentanyl exposure explains most of the variation in increased overdose mortality between 2011 and 2017. Consequently, the epicenter of the overdose crisis shifted towards the eastern United Stat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.04.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rapid spread of fentanyl in unregulated drug markets dramatically increases overdose mortality.

    “Yet the rapid spread of fentanyl in unregulated drug markets dramatically increases overdose mortality,21,22 marking a “significant shift in the structural risk environment” for people who use illicit opioids.23(p108)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zoorob, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Zoorob, Michael
Venue
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
70
Pages
40-46
ISSN
0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944311562
Cited by
160
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, drug overdose deaths, opioid epidemic, drug supply, regional variation, drug seizures, addiction policy, United States
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Fentanyl, Humans, United States, Models, Statistical, Geography, Medical, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review