The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linezolid update: Stable in vitro activity following more than a decade of clinical use and summary of associated resistance mechanisms
Abstract
Linezolid, approved for clinical use since 2000, has become an important addition to the anti-Gram-positive infection armamentarium. This oxazolidinone drug has in vitro and in vivo activity against essentially all Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The in vitro activity of linezolid was well documented prior to its clinical application, and several ongoing surveillance studies demonstrated consistent and potent results during the subsequent years of clinical use. Emergence of resistance has been limited and associated with invasive procedures, deep organ involvement, presence of foreign material and mainly prolonged therapy. Non-susceptible organisms usually demonstrate alterations in the 23S rRNA target, which remain the main resistance mechanism observed in enterococci; although a few reports have described the detection of cfr-mediated resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. S. aureus isolates non-susceptible to linezolid remain rare in large surveillance studies. Most isolates harbour 23S rRNA mutations; however, cfr-carrying MRSA isolates have been observed in the United States and elsewhere. It is still uncertain whether the occurrences of such isolates are becoming more prevalent. Coagulase-negative isolates (CoNS) resistant to linezolid were uncommon following clinical approval. Surveillance data have indicated that CoNS isolates, mainly Staphylococcus epidermidis, currently account for the majority of Gram-positive organisms displaying elevated MIC results to linezolid. In addition, these isolates frequently demonstrate complex and numerous resistance mechanisms, such as alterations in the ribosomal proteins L3 and/or L4 and/or presence of cfr and/or modifications in 23S rRNA. The knowledge acquired during the past decades on this initially used oxazolidinone has been utilized for developing new candidate agents, such as tedizolid and radezolid, and as linezolid patents soon begin to expire, generic brands will certainly become available. These events will likely establish a new chapter for this successful class of antimicrobial agents.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most commonly characterized mechanisms of linezolid resistance include mutations in genes encoding the domain V of the 23S rRNA and/or the ribosomal proteins L3 and L4 (rplC and rplD, respectively), and methylation of A2503 (E. coli numbering) in the 23S rRNA mediated by the Cfr enzyme (see below) (Figure 4) (60).”
From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
Ferraro, M. J. (2000) · Cited by 16,875
Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus
Tsiodras, S., Gold, H. S., Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Wennersten, C. B., Venkataraman, L., Moellering, R. C., & Ferraro, M. J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05410-1 · Cited by 1,034
Long, K. S., Poehlsgaard, J., Kehrenberg, C., Schwarz, Š., & Vester, B. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00131-06 · Cited by 710
In vitro activities of U-100592 and U-100766, novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agents
Zurenko, G. E., Yagi, B. H., Schaadt, R. D., Allison, J. W., Kilburn, J. O., Glickman, S. E., Hutchinson, D. K., Barbachyn, M. R., & Brickner, S. J. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.4.839 · Cited by 460
Oxazolidinones: activity, mode of action, and mechanism of resistance
Bozdoğan, B., & Appelbaum, P. C. (2004) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.11.003 · Cited by 404
Kehrenberg, C., & Schwarz, Š. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.50.4.1156-1163.2006 · Cited by 399
Mechanism of action of oxazolidinones: effects of linezolid and eperezolid on translation reactions
Shinabarger, D. L., Marotti, K. R., Murray, R. W., Lin, A. H., Melchior, E. P., Swaney, S. M., Dunyak, D. S., Demyan, W. F., & Buysse, J. M. (1997) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.41.10.2132 · Cited by 382
Resistance to Linezolid Caused by Modifications at Its Binding Site on the Ribosome
Long, K. S., & Vester, B. (2011) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.05702-11 · Cited by 377
New antibiotic agents in the pipeline and how they can help overcome microbial resistance
Gould, I. M., & Bal, A. M. (2013) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.22507 · Cited by 366
Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Prokocimer, P., Anda, C. S. D., Fang, E., Mehra, P., & Das, A. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.241 · Cited by 362
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gales, 2014, Fatal pneumonia due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398/t034 carrying cfr and erm(B) genes: first report in Brazil, J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015 · Cited by 2,782
Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance
Holmes, A. H., Moore, L. S. P., Sundsfjord, A., Steinbakk, M., Regmi, S., Karkey, A., Guerin, P. J., & Piddock, L. J. V. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00473-0 · Cited by 2,877
Update on the antibiotic resistance crisis
Rossolini, G. M., Arena, F., Pecile, P., & Pollini, S. (2014) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.09.006 · Cited by 708
Antibiotic Resistance and the MRSA Problem
Vestergaard, M. R., Frees, D., & Ingmer, H. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0057-2018 · Cited by 540
Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Virulence Mechanisms of Bacterial Pathogens · doi:10.1128/9781555819286.ch17 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, R. E., Deshpande, L. M., & Jones, R. N.
- Affiliations
- JMI Laboratories (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mendes, Rodrigo E.
- Venue
- Drug Resistance Updates
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1368-7646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977069647
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Resistance Updates (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Keywords
- linezolid, oxazolidinones, antimicrobial resistance, 23S rRNA mutations, cfr gene, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus epidermidis, antimicrobial resistance surveillance, tedizolid, Gram-positive bacterial infections
- MeSH terms
- Linezolid, Acetamides, Ribosomal Protein L3, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Proteins, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Ribosomal Proteins, RNA, Ribosomal, 23S, Tetrazoles, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Drug Approval, Oxazolidinones, Drug Resistance, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review