The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context
Open accessAbstract
Discrete event simulation (DES) and system dynamics (SD) are two modelling approaches widely used as decision support tools in logistics and supply chain management (LSCM). A widely held belief exists that SD is mostly used to model problems at a strategic level, whereas DES is used at an operational/tactical level. This paper explores the application of DES and SD as decision support systems (DSS) for LSCM by looking at the nature and level of issues modelled. Peer reviewed journal papers that use these modelling approaches to study supply chains, published between 1996 and 2006 are reviewed. A total of 127 journal articles are analysed to identify the frequency with which the two simulation approaches are used as modelling tools for DSS in LSCM. Our findings suggest that DES has been used more frequently to model supply chains, with the exception of the bullwhip effect, which is mostly modelled using SD. Based on the most commonly used modelling approach, issues in LSCM are categorised into four groups: the DES domain, the SD domain, the common domain and the less common domain. The study furthermore suggests that in terms of the level of decision making involved, strategic or operational/tactical, there is no difference in the use of either DES or SD. The results of this study inform the existing literature about the use of DES and SD as DSS tools in LSCM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 9,354
Simulation Modeling and Analysis.
Schervish, M. J., Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288169 · Cited by 8,697
Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. J. (2000) · Cited by 2,594
Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation
(2003) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710310461350 · Cited by 2,283
Designing and Managing the Supply Chain
Simchi‐Levi, D. (2002) · Cited by 1,780
Sterman, J. D. (2000) · Cited by 1,322
Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning & Operation
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007) · Das Summa Summarum des Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_22 · Cited by 1,129
Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A multiagent Approach
Swaminathan, J. M., Smith, S. F., & Sadeh, N. M. (1998) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01356.x · Cited by 878
Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use
Robinson, S. (2014) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 869
Self-citationComputer simulation in management science
Pidd, M. (1984) · Cited by 706
Cited by
Compensation of input delay that depends on delayed input
Diagne, M., Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M. (2017) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.069 · Cited by 36
The impacts of inventory record inaccuracy and cycle counting on distribution center performance
Destro, I. R., Staudt, F. H., Somensi, K., & Taboada, C. (2023) · Production · doi:10.1590/0103-6513.20220077 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tako, A. A., & Robinson, S.
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 802-815
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121688053
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 29.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.015
- The paper
- Tako, A. A., & Robinson, S. (2012). The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.