External validity of sentiment mining reports: can current methods identify demographic biases, event biases, and manipulation of reviews?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effects observed on a social platform may manifest differently on other platforms due to different functionalities, communities, or cultural norms.
“For example, effects observed on a social platform may manifest differently on other platforms due to different functionalities, communities, or cultural norms (Wijnhoven and Bloemen, 2014; Malik and Pfeffer, 2016).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Wijnhoven and Bloemen, 2014
Cites
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · see citing works
Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08 · doi:10.1145/1341531.1341560 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Identifying and Filtering Near-Duplicate Documents
Broder, A. Z. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45123-4_1 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text
Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J. W., & Schler, J. (2009) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1461928.1461959 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
“For example, effects observed on a social platform may manifest differently on other platforms due to different functionalities, communities, or cultural norms (Wijnhoven and Bloemen, 2014; Malik and Pfeffer, 2016).”
BackgroundSocial Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Missing the missing values: The ugly duckling of fairness in machine learning
Fernando, M., Cèsar, F., David, N., & José, H. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22415 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wijnhoven, F., & Bloemen, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Wijnhoven, Fons
- ORCID
- Wijnhoven, Fons
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 262-273
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022399093
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, generalizability, demographic bias, review manipulation, user-generated content, stylometry, Goodreads, kernel theory, bias detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
