The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sentiment analysis: Bayesian Ensemble Learning
Open accessAbstract
The huge amount of textual data on the Web has grown in the last few years rapidly creating unique contents of massive dimension. In a decision making context, one of the most relevant tasks is polarity classification of a text source, which is usually performed through supervised learning methods. Most of the existing approaches select the best classification model leading to over-confident decisions that do not take into account the inherent uncertainty of the natural language. In this paper, we pursue the paradigm of ensemble learning to reduce the noise sensitivity related to language ambiguity and therefore to provide a more accurate prediction of polarity. The proposed ensemble method is based on Bayesian Model Averaging, where both uncertainty and reliability of each single model are taken into account. We address the classifier selection problem by proposing a greedy approach that evaluates the contribution of each model with respect to the ensemble. Experimental results on gold standard datasets show that the proposed approach outperforms both traditional classification and ensemble methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Cited by
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
“[210] utilized the ensemble learning approach to mitigate the noise sensitivity related”
MethodDong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z · Cited by 1,928
A comprehensive review on ensemble deep learning: Opportunities and challenges
Mohammed, A., & Kora, R. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.01.014 · Cited by 1,127
Ensemble of keyword extraction methods and classifiers in text classification
Onan, A., Korukoğlu, S., & Bulut, H. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.045 · Cited by 630
Big Data: Deep Learning for financial sentiment analysis
Sohangir, S., Wang, D., Pomeranets, A., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2018) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-017-0111-6 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Pozzi, F. A.
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 26-38
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011432097
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment analysis: Bayesian Ensemble Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dss.2014.10.004
- The paper
- Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Pozzi, F. A. (2014). Sentiment analysis: Bayesian Ensemble Learning. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.