The value of vehicle telematics data in insurance risk selection processes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Including standard telematics variables significantly improves risk assessment of insureds.
“Recently, it has been proven that including standard telematics variables significantly improves risk assessment of insureds”
From The Use of Telematics Devices to Improve Automobile Insurance Rates (2019) · cites this paper as Baecke & Bocca, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Baecke, P., & Bocca, L.
- Affiliations
- Vlerick Business School (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Baecke, Philippe
- ORCID
- Baecke, Philippe
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 69-79
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2608634440
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 19.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
- Keywords
- vehicle telematics, usage-based insurance, pay-as-you-drive, insurance risk assessment, Internet of Things, data mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
