Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 101Supply Chain and Inventory ManagementConsumer Market Behavior and PricingAuction Theory and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal pricing in e-commerce based on sparse and noisy data

Bauer, Josef, Jannach, Dietmar·2018·Decision Support Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.002

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, J., & Jannach, D.
Affiliations
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
  • University of Klagenfurt (AT)
Corresponding author
Bauer, Josef
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
106
Pages
53-63
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775564956
Cited by
92
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
Keywords
dynamic pricing, optimal pricing, e-commerce, data sparsity, noisy data, Bayesian inference, kernel regression, revenue maximization, profit maximization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.