Cited by 74Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMisinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing Detection

Coordinated inauthentic behavior and information spreading on twitter

Open access
Cinelli, Matteo, Cresci, Stefano, Quattrociocchi, Walter, Tesconi, Maurizio, Zola, Paola·2022·Decision Support Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113819

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI systems could analyze how adversaries' disinformation spreads across modern media and social networks, allowing defense and security policymakers to respond faster and more effectively.

    “AI systems could analyze how adversaries’ disinformation spreads across modern media and social networks (Cinelli et al., 2022; Marigliano et al., 2024; Pacheco et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021), allowing our defense and security policymakers to respond faster and more effectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cinelli, M., Cresci, S., Quattrociocchi, W., Tesconi, M., & Zola, P.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IT)
Corresponding author
Cresci, Stefano
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
160
Pages
113819
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281620562
Cited by
74
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
information cascades, information dissemination, Twitter, retweets, algorithmic amplification, misinformation, saturation effects, social media influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review