Cited by 45Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with cardiovascular disease

Vanjiappan, Sivabal, Hamide, Abdoul, Ananthakrishnan, Ramesh, Periyasamy, Senthilkumar Gandhipuram, Mehalingam, Vadivelan·2018·Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews

Abstract

Introduction Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a wide spectrum of liver disease that ranges from hepatic steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Obesity and diabetes mellitus are the prime risk factors for NAFLD. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of NAFLD among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to detect the association of NAFLD with cardiovascular disease in them. Study design Prospective observational study. Material and methods The study was conducted on 300 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the outpatient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. All patients underwent hepatic ultrasonography to look for hepatic steatosis. Among the 300 patients, 124 were divided into NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups based on the ultrasound findings. These patients were subjected to electrocardiogram, 2D echocardiogram, carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) measurement and ankle brachial pressure index measurement along with measurement of markers of oxidative stress. Results Hepatic steatosis was present in 61% of diabetic patients in this study. Cardiovascular disease was not found to be significantly associated in diabetic patients with NAFLD. However, cardiovascular risk factors like CIMT, high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were elevated in these patients. hs-CRP and MDA levels were found to be significantly associated with the severity of NAFLD. Conclusion There is a high prevalenc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanjiappan, S., Hamide, A., Ananthakrishnan, R., Periyasamy, S. G., & Mehalingam, V.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehalingam, Vadivelan
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
479-482
ISSN
1871-4021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791724547
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, hepatic steatosis, cardiovascular disease, carotid intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, malondialdehyde, oxidative stress, NAFLD severity, prevalence
MeSH terms
C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Biomarkers, Prevalence, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review