Cited by 80Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentInfant Health and Development

Emotional stress in pregnancy predicts human infant reactivity

Möhler, Eva, Parzer, Peter, Brunner, Romuald, Wiebel, Angelika, Resch, Franz·2006·Early Human Development

Abstract

Background Infant distress to novelty at 4 months of life has previously been identified as an important predictor of longer term emotional development in childhood and adolescence.Aim To investigate the relationship between prenatal stress and infant reactivity to unfamiliar visual, auditory and olfactory stimuli.Study design Maternal emotional stress, life events and medical adversities during pregnancy and maternal personality characteristics were assessed by interview, questionnaire and patient charts at 2 weeks postnatal age. Postnatal maternal psychopathology was assessed at 2 weeks and 4 months postnatal age. Infant outcome was examined 4 months postnatally.Subjects 102 mother-infant pairs were recruited in local obstetric units, complete datasets were available for 96 mother-infant-pairs.Outcome measure Infant reactivity to unfamiliar stimuli was assessed when the infants were 4 months postnatal age.Results Maternal prenatal emotional stress was significantly associated with infant affective reactivity to novelty. Maternal postnatal psychopathology did not have an influence on affective infant reactivity.Conclusions These data provide evidence for an impact of maternal emotional stress in pregnancy on early infant distress to novel stimuli, a behavioral trait whose stability throughout childhood and adolescence has previously been demonstrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.02.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prenatal exposure to maternal stress hormones is linked to temperamental reactivity and stress physiology, likely through epigenetic regulation of gene expression.

    “prenatal exposure to maternal stress hormones is linked to temperamental reactivity and stress physiology, likely through epigenetic regulation of gene expression”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Möhler et al., 2006

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 80

Authors
Möhler, E., Parzer, P., Brunner, R., Wiebel, A., & Resch, F.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Möhler, Eva
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
82
Issue
11
Pages
731-737
ISSN
0378-3782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085119087
Cited by
80
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
prenatal stress, infant reactivity, novelty, infant distress, maternal personality, maternal psychopathology, pregnancy, early infancy, emotional development
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mothers, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review