Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cover crops can reduce nitrate leaching after cash crop harvest.
“Cover crops can reduce nitrate leaching after cash crop harvest.”
From Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching (2022) · cites this paper as Daryanto et al., 2018
Cites
A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems
Schipanski, M. E., Barbercheck, M., Douglas, M. R., Finney, D. M., Haider, K., Kaye, J. P., Kemanian, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., Ryan, M. R., Tooker, J., et al. (2014) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conservation agriculture as a sustainable system for soil health: a review
Cárceles Rodríguez, B., Durán-Zuazo, V. H., Soriano Rodríguez, M., García-Tejero, I. F., Gálvez Ruiz, B., & Cuadros Tavira, S. (2022) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Adesina, I., Bhowmik, A., Sharma, H., & Shahbazi, A. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10040129 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Liu, L., Yang, J., Duan, Y., Luo, Y., Taherzadeh, M. J., Li, Y., Li, H., Awasthi, M. K., & Zhao, Z. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136983 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching
Sedghi, N., & Weil, R. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.1002/jeq2.20342 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Daryanto, S., Fu, B., Wang, L., Jacinthe, P.-A., & Zhao, W.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fu, Bojie
- Wang, Lixin
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 185
- Pages
- 357-373
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809877221
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 22.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 270 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Earth-Science Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Author eBooks
- Funders
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (121311KYSB20170004)
- National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFA0604701)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- cover crops, ecosystem services, soil health, soil erosion control, water quality regulation, soil water retention, soil organic matter, soil microbial biomass, greenhouse gas emissions, pest and weed control, nematodes, cash crop yield, tillage, fallow, sustainable agriculture, trade-offs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
