The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 196 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Land-surface parameters for spatial predictive mapping and modeling
Open accessAbstract
Land-surface parameters derived from digital land surface models (DLSMs) (for example, slope, surface curvature, topographic position, topographic roughness, aspect, heat load index, and topographic moisture index) can serve as key predictor variables in a wide variety of mapping and modeling tasks relating to geomorphic processes, landform delineation, ecological and habitat characterization, and geohazard, soil, wetland, and general thematic mapping and modeling. However, selecting features from the large number of potential derivatives that may be predictive for a specific feature or process can be complicated, and existing literature may offer contradictory or incomplete guidance. The availability of multiple data sources and the need to define moving window shapes, sizes, and cell weightings further complicate selecting and optimizing the feature space. This review focuses on the calculation and use of DLSM parameters for empirical spatial predictive modeling applications, which rely on training data and explanatory variables to make predictions of landscape features and processes over a defined geographic extent. The target audience for this review is researchers and analysts undertaking predictive modeling tasks that make use of the most widely used terrain variables. To outline best practices and highlight future research needs, we review a range of land-surface parameters relating to steepness, local relief, rugosity, slope orientation, solar insolation, and moisture and characterize their relationship to geomorphic processes. We then discuss important considerations when selecting such parameters for predictive mapping and modeling tasks to assist analysts in answering two critical questions: What landscape conditions or processes does a given measure characterize? How might a particular metric relate to the phenomenon or features being mapped, modeled, or studied? We recommend the use of landscape- and problem-specific pilot studies to answer, to the extent possible, these questions for potential features of interest in a mapping or modeling task. We describe existing techniques to reduce the size of the feature space using feature selection and feature reduction methods, assess the importance or contribution of specific metrics, and parameterize moving windows or characterize the landscape at varying scales using alternative methods while highlighting strengths, drawbacks, and knowledge gaps for specific techniques. Recent developments, such as explainable machine learning and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning, may guide and/or minimize the need for feature space engineering and ease the use of DLSMs in predictive modeling tasks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 13,117
LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space
Pearson, K. (1901) · The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 · Cited by 12,864
An Introduction to Statistical Learning
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 · Cited by 12,106
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Eisank, 2011, A generic procedure for semantics-oriented landform classification using object-based image analysis, Geomorphometry, 2011, 125
- Gessler, 1995, Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 9, 421, 10.1080/02693799508902047 · DOI
- Goldberg, 2006, Genetic algorithms, Pearson Education India
- Jasiewicz, 2013, Content-based landscape retrieval using geomorphons, Geomorphometry, 2013, 52
- Kai, 2013, Research on the classification of terrain texture from DEMs based on BP neural network, Geomorphometry, 2013, 1
- Lopez, 2002, Use surface area for realistic calculations, GeoWorld, 15, 25
- Maxwell, 2019, Is high spatial resolution DEM data necessary for mapping palustrine wetlands?, Int. J. Remote Sens., 40, 118, 10.1080/01431161.2018.1506184 · DOI
- Riley, 1999, Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity, Intermount. J. Sci., 5, 23
- Stepinski, 2011, Geomorphons-a new approach to classification of landforms, Proceedings of geomorphometry, 109
- Tarboton, 2005, 3012, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–105 of 105
Reuter, H. I., Grohmann, C. H., & Lecours, V. (2026) · Developments in psychiatry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-333376-7.00044-6
Satellite-Based Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Mountain Pastures of Armenia
Այվազյան, Գ., Medvedev, A., Muradyan, V. S., Середа, И. И., Hovsepyan, A., Avetisyan, A., Baghdasaryan, A., Avetisyan, R., Khlghatyan, A., Sargsyan, A., et al. (2026) · Land · doi:10.3390/land15091689
Xia, Y., Yao, H., Ma, C., Chen, F., & Liu, Y. (2026) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2026.3736041
Li, Q., & Li, X. (2026) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-026-08489-9
Kinga, P., & Herdzik, B. (2023) · Data Engineering and Applications · doi:10.64972/dea.2023.v2i3.3671d:1-13
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxwell, A. E., & Shobe, C. M.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maxwell, Aaron E.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 226
- Pages
- 103944
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210565847
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 196
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Earth-Science Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NASA West Virginia Space Grant Consortium
- National Science Foundation (2046059)
- National Science Foundation Directorate for Geosciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Geography and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
- Keywords
- terrain variables, land surface parameters, predictive mapping, feature selection, feature space reduction, sliding window analysis, landscape metrics, slope, local relief, rugosity, solar irradiation, geomorphological processes, explainable machine learning, convolutional neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review