CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a measure to assess invalidating childhood environments in the eating disorders

Mountford, Victoria, Corstorphine, Emma, Tomlinson, Sophie, Waller, Glenn·2007·Eating Behaviors
DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective The role of childhood abuse is well recognised within the eating disorders. However, the impact of parental invalidation of the child's emotional needs has not been investigated. Such invalidation is potentially important because it appears to be associated with the difficulties in tolerating distress that are often seen in adults with eating disorders. This study aims to develop a measure of childhood invalidating environments (Invalidating Childhood Environments Scale; ICES). It also investigated the relationship between childhood experiences, levels of distress tolerance and eating pathology.Method Seventy-three eating-disordered women and 62 non-eating-disordered women completed a newly developed measure of invalidating environments (ICES), the Eating Disorders Inventory, and a Distress Tolerance Scale.Results The ICES had acceptable psychometric and clinical validity. Women who scored highly on the ICES had greater levels of eating disturbance. Within the clinical sample, the data were compatible with a model where difficulties in tolerating distress partially mediate the relationship between perceived invalidation by the father and eating pathology.Conclusions Parental invalidation is a potentially important construct in the eating disorders. This paper demonstrates that the ICES is a valid measure of that construct. This study suggests a clear framework for working with patients, where evidence of an invalidating childhood environment indicates a need to work with patients on their capacity to tolerate distress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.01.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Serpell, 1999, Anorexia nervosa: Friend or foe?, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 177, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199903)25:2<177::AID-EAT7>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  2. Wiser, 1999, Dialectical behaviour therapy for binge-eating disorder, Psychotherapy in Practice, 55, 755

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mountford, V., Corstorphine, E., Tomlinson, S., & Waller, G.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Mountford, Victoria
ORCID
Venue
Eating Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
48-58
ISSN
1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.01.003
OpenAlex
W2035101625
Cited by
174
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
23.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
eating disorders, distress tolerance, scale development, psychometric validation, father-child relationship, emotional needs, eating pathology, women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bulimia, Child, Child Abuse, Defense Mechanisms, Emotions, Father-Child Relations, Female, Humans, Mother-Child Relations, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Social Environment, Social Support, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review