Attenuated interoceptive sensitivity in overweight and obese individuals
Abstract
Objective Perceiving internal signals of hunger and satiety is related to the regulation of food intake. Recent data suggest that interoception (perception of bodily signals) and interoceptive sensitivity (sensitivity for internal signals) might be a crucial variable for the regulation of behavior associated with feelings of satiety. It is yet unclear whether interoceptive sensitivity is altered in overweight and obese participants. Design and methods We therefore examined interoceptive sensitivity among 75 overweight and obese women and men using a heartbeat detection task and compared them to normal weight controls. We hypothesized that overweight and obesity would be related to attenuated interoceptive sensitivity. Results Interoceptive sensitivity was higher in normal weight participants as compared to overweight and obese participants. Additionally, we found a negative correlation coefficient between the BMI and interoceptive sensitivity in the overweight and obese group only. Conclusions In accordance with our hypotheses, we found evidence for reduced interoceptive sensitivity in overweight and obese individuals. Interoceptive sensitivity presumably interacts with the regulation of food intake in everyday life in part by facilitating the detection of bodily changes accompanying satiety. Overweight and obese individuals might experience greater difficulties in accurately detecting such signals due to reduced interoceptive sensitivity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor interoceptive accuracy has been linked to being overweight.
“Poor interoceptive accuracy has also been linked to being overweight (Herbert and Pollatos, 2014).”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Herbert and Pollatos, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O.
- Affiliations
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Herbert, Beate M.
- Pollatos, Olga
- Venue
- Eating Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 445-448
- ISSN
- 1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017283051
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universität Potsdam
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- interoceptive sensitivity, interoception, obesity, overweight, heartbeat detection, satiety, hunger, food intake regulation, body mass index, body weight
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Eating, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hunger, Male, Obesity, Perception, Satiation, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Overweight, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review