Cited by 177Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Probiotic with or without Fiber Controls Body Fat Mass, Associated with Serum Zonulin, in Overweight and Obese Adults—Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Stenman, Lotta K., Lehtinen, Markus J., Meland, Nils, Christensen, Jeffrey E., Yeung, Nicolas, Saarinen, Markku T., Courtney, Michael, Burcelin, Rémy +7 more·2016·EBioMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiota is interlinked with obesity, but direct evidence of effects of its modulation on body fat mass is still scarce. We investigated the possible effects of Bifidobacterium animalisssp. lactis 420 (B420) and the dietary fiber Litesse® Ultra polydextrose (LU) on body fat mass and other obesity-related parameters. METHODS: CFU/d. Body composition was monitored with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the primary outcome was relative change in body fat mass, comparing treatment groups to Placebo. Other outcomes included anthropometric measurements, food intake and blood and fecal biomarkers. The study was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01978691). FINDINGS: There were marked differences in the results of the Intention-To-Treat (ITT; n=209) and Per Protocol (PP; n=134) study populations. The PP analysis included only those participants who completed the intervention with >80% product compliance and no antibiotic use. In addition, three participants were excluded from DXA analyses for PP due to a long delay between the end of intervention and the last DXA measurement. There were no significant differences between groups in body fat mass in the ITT population. However, LU+B420 and B420 seemed to improve weight management in the PP population. For relative change in body fat mass, LU+B420 showed a-4.5% (-1.4kg, P=0.02, N=37) difference to the Placebo group, whereas LU (+0.3%, P=1.00, N=35) and B420 (-3.0%, P=0.28, N=24) alone had no effect (overall ANOVA P=0.095, Placebo N=35). A post-hoc factorial analysis was significant for B420 (-4.0%, P=0.002 vs. Placebo). Changes in fat mass were most pronounced in the abdominal region, and were reflected by similar changes in waist circumference. B420 and LU+B420 also significantly reduced energy intake compared to Placebo. Changes in blood zonulin levels and hsCRP were associated with corresponding changes in trunk fat mass in the LU+B420 group and in the overall population. There were no differences between groups in the incidence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial demonstrates that a probiotic product with or without dietary fiber controls body fat mass. B420 and LU+B420 also reduced waist circumference and food intake, whereas LU alone had no effect on the measured outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.036

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific mechanisms mediated in the gut by ingested probiotics may be involved, such as digestion and absorption of sugar or increased production of short-chain fatty acids.

    “Researchers have stated that specific mechanisms mediated in the gut by ingested probiotics may be involved (for example, digestion and absorption of sugar or increased production of short-chain fatty acids) [142].”
  • Certain bacterial populations-A. muciniphila, F. prausnitzii, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Christensenellaceae-are better represented in lean individuals compared to those who are overweight or metabolically unhealthy.

    “Cross-sectional studies have shown that certain bacterial populations—such as A. muciniphila, F. prausnitzii, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Christensenellaceae—are better represented in lean individuals compared to those who are overweight or metabolically unhealthy (Stenman et al., 2016).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Stenman et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 177

Authors
Stenman, L. K., Lehtinen, M. J., Meland, N., Christensen, J. E., Yeung, N., Saarinen, M. T., Courtney, M., Burcelin, R., Lähdeaho, M.-L., Linros, J., Apter, D., Scheinin, M., Kloster Smerud, H., Rissanen, A., & Lahtinen, S.
Affiliations
  • DuPont (Finland) (FI)
  • Smerud Medical Research (Norway) (NO)
  • FinnMedi (Finland) (FI)
  • Kuluva Hospital (UG)
  • VL-Medi Oy (Finland) (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Stenman, Lotta K.
Venue
EBioMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
13
Pages
190-200
ISSN
2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2545199093
Cited by
177
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EBioMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
probiotics, dietary fiber, polydextrose, fat mass, obesity, overweight, zonulin, gut microbiota, abdominal fat, waist circumference, energy intake, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, weight management, per-protocol analysis, medication adherence, antibiotic use, fecal biomarkers
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Cholera Toxin, Dietary Fiber, Female, Haptoglobins, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Protein Precursors, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Overweight, Waist Circumference, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review