Cited by 120Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut microbiota composition during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes

Open access
Loughman, Amy, Ponsonby, Anne-Louise, O'Hely, Martin, Symeonides, Christos, Collier, Fiona, Tang, Mimi L.K., Carlin, John, Ranganathan, Sarath +7 more·2020·EBioMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite intense interest in the relationship between gut microbiota and brain development, longitudinal data from human studies are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the composition of gut microbiota during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes. METHODS: A subcohort of 201 children with behavioural outcome measures was identified within a longitudinal, Australian birth-cohort study. The faecal microbiota were analysed at 1, 6, and 12 months of age. Behavioural outcomes were measured at 2 years of age. FINDINGS: In an unselected birth cohort, we found a clear association between decreased normalised abundance of Prevotella in faecal samples collected at 12 months of age and increased behavioural problems at 2 years, in particular Internalizing Problem scores. This association appeared independent of multiple potentially confounding variables, including maternal mental health. Recent exposure to antibiotics was the best predictor of decreased Prevotella. INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate a strong association between the composition of the gut microbiota in infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes; and support the importance of responsible use of antibiotics during early life. FUNDING: This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1082307, 1147980, 1129813), The Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Perpetual Trustees, and The Shepherd Foundation. The funders had no involvement in the data collection, analysis or interpretation, trial design, recruitment or any other aspect pertinent to the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102640

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although human data are limited to date, the relative abundance of dietary fiber-linked Prevotella in infants at 12 months was recently associated with child behavioral dysregulation at 2 years of age.

    “Although human data are limited to date, the relative abundance of the dietary fiber-linked Prevotella in infants at 12 mo was recently associated with child behavioral dysregulation at 2 y of age (269).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 120

Authors
Loughman, A., Ponsonby, A.-L., O'Hely, M., Symeonides, C., Collier, F., Tang, M. L. K., Carlin, J., Ranganathan, S., Allen, K., Pezic, A., Saffery, R., Jacka, F., Harrison, L. C., Sly, P. D., & Vuillermin, P.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Vuillermin, Peter
Venue
EBioMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
52
Pages
102640
ISSN
2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006075899
Cited by
120
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-04-01)
Open access
Locations
  • EBioMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Bank for International Settlements
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Allergan
  • Deakin University
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, infancy, behavioral problems, internalizing problems, Prevotella, fecal microbiota, antibiotic exposure, early life, brain development, child development, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Age Factors, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Australia, Brain, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Feces, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Risk Factors, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Cohort Studies, Infant Behavior, Biodiversity, Metagenome, Neurogenesis, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review