Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kidney damage causally affects the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study

Open access
Chen, Xiong, Kong, Jianqiu, Pan, Jiexin, Huang, Kai, Zhou, Wenhao, Diao, Xiayao, Cai, Jiahao, Zheng, Junjiong, Yang, Xuefan, Xie, Weibin, Yu, Hao, Li, Jiande, Pei, Lu, Dong, Wen, Qin, Haide, Huang, Jian, Lin, Tianxin·2021·eBioMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in the brain cortical structures of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported; however, the cause has not been determined yet. Herein, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to reveal the causal effect of kidney damage on brain cortical structure. METHODS: Genome-wide association studies summary data of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 480,698 participants from the CKDGen Consortium were used to identify genetically predicted eGFR. Data from 567,460 individuals from the CKDGen Consortium were used to assess genetically determined CKD; 302,687 participants from the UK Biobank were used to evaluate genetically predicted albuminuria. Further, data from 51,665 patients from the ENIGMA Consortium were used to assess the relationship between genetic predisposition and reduced eGFR, CKD, and progressive albuminuria with alterations in cortical thickness (TH) or surficial area (SA) of the brain. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the SA and TH globally and in 34 functional regions. Inverse-variance weighted was used as the primary estimate whereas MR Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier, MR-Egger and weighted median were used to detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy. FINDINGS: ). No pleiotropy was detected. INTERPRETATION: Kidney damage causally influences the cortex structure which suggests the existence of a kidney-brain axis. FUNDING: This study was supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020A1515111119 and 2017B020227007), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0902803), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81825016, 81961128027, 81772719, 81772728), the Key Areas Research and Development Program of Guangdong (Grant No. 2018B010109006), Guangdong Special Support Program (2017TX04R246), Grant KLB09001 from the Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Gene Regulation and Target Therapy of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, and Grants from the Guangdong Science and Technology Department (2020B1212060018).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103592

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Kong, J., Pan, J., Huang, K., Zhou, W., Diao, X., Cai, J., Zheng, J., Yang, X., Xie, W., Yu, H., Li, J., Pei, L., Dong, W., Qin, H., Huang, J., & Lin, T.
Venue
eBioMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
72
Pages
103592
ISSN
2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203318770
Cited by
267
References
41
FWCI
26.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kidney damage causally affects the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103592
The paper
Chen, X., Kong, J., Pan, J., Huang, K., Zhou, W., Diao, X., Cai, J., Zheng, J., Yang, X., Xie, W., Yu, H., Li, J., Pei, L., Dong, W., Qin, H., Huang, J., & Lin, T. (2021). Kidney damage causally affects the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study. eBioMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.