Cited by 77Congenital Heart Disease StudiesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

First-Trimester Fetal Echocardiography: Identification of Cardiac Structures for Screening from 6 to 13 Weeks’ Gestational Age

Hutchinson, Darren, McBrien, Angela, Howley, Lisa, Yamamoto, Yuka, Sekar, Priya, Motan, Tarek, Jain, Venu, Savard, Winnie +1 more·2017·Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Abstract

Background Early fetal echocardiography (FE), performed at 12 to 16 weeks' gestational age (GA), can be used to screen for fetal heart disease akin to that routinely performed in the second trimester. The efficacy of FE at earlier GAs has not been as well explored, particularly with recent advances in ultrasound technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of early FE in assessing fetal heart structure, and the added benefit of color Doppler (CD), from as early as 6 weeks through to 13+6 weeks' GA. Methods Pregnant women were prospectively recruited for first-trimester FE. All underwent two-dimensional (2D) cardiac imaging combined with CD assessment, and all were offered second-trimester fetal echocardiographic evaluations. Fetal cardiac anatomy was assessed both in real time during FE and additionally offline by two separate reviewers. Results Very early FE was performed in 202 pregnancies including a total of 261 fetuses, with 92% (n = 241) being reassessed at ≥18 weeks' GA. Mean GA at FE was 10+6 weeks (range, 6+1 to 13+6 weeks). Transabdominal scanning was used in all cases, and transvaginal scanning was used additionally in most at <11 weeks' GA (n = 103 of 117 [88%]). There was stepwise improvement in image resolution of the fetal heart in those pregnancies that presented at later gestation for assessment. CD assisted with definition of cardiac anatomy at all GAs. A four-chambered heart could be identified in 52% of patients in the eighth week (n = 12 of 23), improving to 80% (n = 36 of 45) in the 10th week and 98% (n = 57 of 58) by the 11th week. The inferior vena cava was visualized by 2D imaging in only 4% (n = 1 of 23) in the eighth week, increasing to 13% (n = 6 of 45) by the 10th week and 80% (n = 25 of 31) by the 13th week. CD improved visualization of the inferior vena cava at earlier GAs to >80% (n = 37 of 45) from 10 weeks. Pulmonary veins were not visualized by either 2D imaging or CD until after the 11th week. Both cardiac outflow tracts could be visualized by 2D imaging in the minority from 8+0 to 10+6 weeks (n = 18 of 109 [16%]) but were imaged in most from 11+0 to 13+6 weeks (n = 114 of 144 [79%]). CD imaging improved visualization of both outflow tracts to 64% (n = 29 of 45) in the 10th week. On 2D imaging alone, both the aortic and ductal arches were seen in only 29% of patients in the 10th week (n = 13 of 45), increasing to 58% when CD was used (58% [n = 26 of 45]) and to >80% (n = 47 of 58) using CD in the 11th week. Conclusions Very early FE, from as early as 8 weeks, can be used to assess cardiac structures. The ability to image fetal heart structures between 6 and 8 weeks is currently nondiagnostic. The use of CD significantly increases the detection of cardiac structures on early FE. The ideal timing of complete early FE, excluding pulmonary vein assessment, appears to be after 11 weeks' GA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.echo.2017.03.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Color Doppler contributes significantly to the visualization of both outflow tracts before 10 gestational weeks, as detection increased from only 16% with 2D imaging to 64% with color Doppler.

    “Of note, color Doppler contributes significantly to the visualization of both outflow tracts before 10 gestational weeks, as detection increased from only 16% with 2D imaging to 64% with color Doppler [47].”
  • Application of color Doppler significantly improved visualization of the fetal heart in early pregnancy compared with 2D imaging, especially relating to the inferior vena cava, pulmonary veins and aortic and ductal arches.

    “Moreover, application of color Doppler significantly improved visualization of the fetal heart in early pregnancy compared with 2D imaging, especially relating to the inferior vena cava, pulmonary veins and aortic and ductal arches [47].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 77

Authors
Hutchinson, D., McBrien, A., Howley, L., Yamamoto, Y., Sekar, P., Motan, T., Jain, V., Savard, W., & Hornberger, L. K.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Hornberger, Lisa K.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
763-772
ISSN
0894-7317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613149885
Cited by
77
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
fetal cardiac anatomy, color Doppler ultrasound, gestational age, transvaginal ultrasound, fetal echocardiography, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Heart, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review