Adverse Effects of Depression on Glycemic Control and Health Outcomes in People with Diabetes
Abstract
In the past decades, important advances have been achieved in the psychological aspects of diabetes. This article reviews the associations between diabetes, depression, and adverse health outcomes. The article provides an update on the literature regarding the prevalence of depression in diabetes, discusses the impact of depression on diabetes self-care and glycemic control in people with diabetes, and summarizes the results of longitudinal studies that have investigated depression as a risk factor for adverse health outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diabetes distress is common in people with type 1 diabetes.
“Diabetes distress is common and mental illness has been shown to be associated with poor disease control, and decreased health and QoL in this group of individuals.6 7”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for adult type 1 diabetes management: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Mental illness is associated with decreased health and quality of life in people with type 1 diabetes.
“Diabetes distress is common and mental illness has been shown to be associated with poor disease control, and decreased health and QoL in this group of individuals.6 7”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for adult type 1 diabetes management: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Mental illness is associated with poor disease control in people with type 1 diabetes.
“Diabetes distress is common and mental illness has been shown to be associated with poor disease control, and decreased health and QoL in this group of individuals.6 7”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for adult type 1 diabetes management: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- Pouwer, F., Nefs, G., & Nouwen, A.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- Venue
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 529-544
- ISSN
- 0889-8529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109510970
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- depression, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, diabetes self-care, adverse health effects, depression as risk factor, psychological aspects of diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prevalence, Diabetes Complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
