Improvement in scoring consistency for the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument©
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The C-SEI has established evidence of reliability and validity for simulation-based assessment.
“The C-SEI developed by Parsons et al. [14] was selected as the primary observational measure because it was developed to evaluate nursing student performance in simulated clinical environments and has established evidence of reliability and validity for simulation-based assessment.”
A post hoc sensitivity assessment was conducted using the observed effect size for the primary outcome, leadership performance measured using the C-SEI.
“A post hoc sensitivity assessment was conducted using the observed effect size for the primary outcome, leadership performance measured using the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI) [14].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almalki, M. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.117315
“A post hoc sensitivity assessment was conducted using the observed effect size for the primary outcome, leadership performance measured using the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI) [14].”
- Authors
- Parsons, M. E., Hawkins, K. S., Hercinger, M., Todd, M., Manz, J. A., & Fang, X.
- Affiliations
- Creighton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parsons, Mary E.
- Venue
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e233-e238
- ISSN
- 1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119949415
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- scoring consistency, inter-rater reliability, faculty training, clinical simulation, nursing education, student assessment, kappa statistic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
