The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe's Content Validity Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
LAWSHE, C. H. (1975) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x · Cited by 7,313
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
LYNN, M. R. (1986) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · Cited by 6,775
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20199 · Cited by 5,273
Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts
Davis, L. L. (1992) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80008-4 · Cited by 2,364
A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability
DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x · Cited by 1,889
Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175613513808 · Cited by 1,502
Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175612440286 · Cited by 701
Use of Qualitative Methods to Enhance Content Validity
TILDEN, V. P., NELSON, C. A., & MAY, B. A. (1990) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-199005000-00015 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Validity and reliability of a food skills questionnaire
Kennedy, L. G., Kichler, E. J., Seabrook, J. A., Matthews, J. I., & Dworatzek, P. D. N. (2019) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.02.003 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S.
- Venue
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 530-531
- ISSN
- 1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2525475086
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 41.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe's Content Validity Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
- The paper
- Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe's Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.