Sequential extraction of anaerobic digestate sludge for the determination of partitioning of heavy metals
Abstract
In China, agricultural use of anaerobic digestate sludge is considered a concern due to high heavy metal content of the sludge. In this study, sequential extraction procedure (SEP) was conducted to determine metal speciation which affects release and mobility of metal significantly. The results of SEP showed that each heavy metal possessed different distribution characteristics. Cu mainly reacted with carboxyl functional group to form the fraction bound to organic matter. Zn and Mn were dominated in the fraction bound to Fe-Mn oxides and carbonates, respectively. Pb, Ni, Cr, Cd and As were present as the residual fraction. Examination of mobility factors (MFs) indicated that Zn, Pb, Ni, Mn and Cd were more mobile whereas Cr and As were immobilized in anaerobic digestate. Based on the results, it can be stated that Cu, Zn, Mn, Ni and Cd may be grouped as toxic and active components in sludge and should be regarded as the priority pollutants for elimination. Pb should be monitored in terms of its high mobility factors (MF). Cr and As, nevertheless, were the most stable components in sludge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digestate, especially from pig or chicken manure, contains higher amounts of metal(loid)s than manure.
“Digestate, especially when processed from pig or chicken manure, contains higher amounts of metal(loid)s than manure (Demirel et al., 2013;Zhu et al., 2014), which suggests that its application could be a concern, particularly on those soils which already contain trace elements.”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Zhu, N.-M., Qiang-Li, Guo, X.-J., Hui-Zhang, & Yu-Deng
- Affiliations
- Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Neng-min
- ORCID
- Zhu, Neng-min
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 18-24
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076010801
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- the Central Public Research Institutes for Basic Research Foundation of China (2012ZL001)
- the Provincial Technology and Development Program of Jilin Province, China (20110263)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- digestate, heavy metal speciation, metal mobility, mobility factor, metal fractionation, copper, zinc, manganese, lead, nickel, chromium, cadmium, arsenic, carboxyl groups, iron and manganese oxides, carbonates, priority pollutants
- MeSH terms
- China, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Sewage, Risk Assessment, Metals, Heavy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review