The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review
Abstract
With the development of grain production technologies and improvement of rural living standard, the production and utilization of straw have significantly been changed in China. More than 1 billion tones of straw are produced per year, and vast amount of them are discarded without effective utilization, leading various environmental and social impacts. Straw return is an effective approach of the straw utilization that has been greatly recommended by government and scientists in China. This paper discussed the current status of the straw return in China. Specifically, the production and models of straw return were explored and their environmental impacts were extensively evaluated. It was concluded that straw could be positively effective on the improvement of the soil quality and the grain production. However, it appeared that the straw return also had several neglect negative effects, implying that further research and assessment on the returned straw are required before its large-scale promotion in China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Cooper, R. N., Houghton, J. T., McCarthy, J. J., & Metz, B. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033020 · Cited by 12,889
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands
Guo, J. H., Liu, X. J., Zhang, Y., Shen, J. L., Han, W. X., Zhang, W. F., Christie, P., Goulding, K. W. T., Vitousek, P. M., & Zhang, F. S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182570 · Cited by 3,960
An overview of the chemical composition of biomass
Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2010) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 · Cited by 2,519
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century
Fowler, D., Coyle, M., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., Cape, J. N., Reis, S., Sheppard, L. J., Jenkins, A., Grizzetti, B., Galloway, J. N., et al. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0164 · Cited by 2,074
Rapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Yang, G., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Gao, G. F., Liang, X., Zhou, M., Wan, X., Yu, S., Jiang, Y., Naghavi, M., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61097-1 · Cited by 1,982
Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.015 · Cited by 1,944
Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues
Kim, S., & Dale, B. E. (2004) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.002 · Cited by 1,930
Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review
Cameron, K. C., Di, H. J., & Moir, J. L. (2013) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/aab.12014 · Cited by 1,425
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Dai, M., Dai, S., & Dong, X.
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 293-300
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803247192
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 132
- FWCI
- 22.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014
- The paper
- Li, H., Dai, M., Dai, S., & Dong, X. (2018). Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
