Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The variation in microbial community structure under different heavy metal contamination levels in paddy soils

Lin, Yaoben, Ye, Yanmei, Hu, Yiming, Shi, Haokun·2019·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

As a global pollution problem, heavy metal contamination poses a serious hazard to soil microorganisms which play an extremely important role in soil chemical cycling and ecological persistence. However, the effects that different levels of heavy metal contamination in soils have on microorganisms and the interactions between them are still unclear. The purpose of this research is to analyze the microbial structure under different levels of heavy metal contamination, find out heavy metal tolerant species under different environmental conditions, then provide useful reference for the bioremediation of contaminated farmland. In this study, 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the microbial communities in severe level (SL), moderate level (ML), light level (LL) and clean level (CL) of heavy metal contaminated soils, and the relationships between environment variables and microorganisms were analyzed. The results showed that the concentrations of heavy metals and soil physicochemical properties had various impacts on microbial community composition under different heavy metal contamination levels. Most dominant bacteria were in significant negative correlation with Cd in ML region, and significantly correlated with TN and OM in LL region. However, there was no significant correlation between dominant fungi and the physicochemical properties in LL region. And most of the dominant fungi were significantly correlated with the heavy metal concentrations in SL region. The bacterial phyla such as Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes showed more tolerance with heavy metal contamination in SL, ML and LL regions, respectively. Meanwhile, the dominant fungi of Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Glomeromycota, Zygomycota and Rozellomycota showed stronger correlations with heavy metal contamination in SL and LL regions. These results indicated that some microorganisms had strong tolerance to heavy metal contamination and had certain heavy metals digestion ability, which can create an appropriate soil environment for the growth of food crops.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.057

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Lin, Y., Ye, Y., Hu, Y., & Shi, H.
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
180
Pages
557-564
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946330754
Cited by
248
References
2
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The variation in microbial community structure under different heavy metal contamination levels in paddy soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.057
The paper
Lin, Y., Ye, Y., Hu, Y., & Shi, H. (2019). The variation in microbial community structure under different heavy metal contamination levels in paddy soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.