Cited by 133Heavy metals in environmentMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Application of Festuca arundinacea in phytoremediation of soils contaminated with Pb, Ni, Cd and petroleum hydrocarbons

Steliga, Teresa, Kluk, Dorota·2020·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Phytoremediation is a promising "green technique" used to purify contaminated soils. The performed phytoremediation experiments assisted by the fertilization process involving pots of F.arundinacea grown on soils with diverse concentrations and types of contaminations produced the following decreased percentages after 6 months: Pb (25.4-34.1%), Ni (18.7-23.8%), Cd (26.3-46.7%), TPH (49.4-60.1%). Primarily, TPH biodegradation was occurring as a result of basic bioremediation stimulated by adding optimal volumes of biogenic substances and corrections in the soil reaction, while phytoremediation improved this process by 17.4 - 23.1%. The highest drop in a range of 45.6 - 55.5% was recorded for the group of C 12 -C 18 hydrocarbons, with the lowest one for C 25 -C 36 , amounting to 9.1-17.4%. Translocation factor values were: TF<1 and ranged, respectively, for: Pb (0.46-0.53), Ni (0.29-0.33), and Cd (0.21-0.25), which indicate that heavy metals absorbed by Festuca arundinacea they mainly accumulated in the root of the tissue in descending order: Cd <Ni <Pb, showing poor metal translocation from roots to shoots. Co-occurrence of petroleum pollutants (TPH) in contaminated (Pb, Cd, Ni) soils results in reducing their contents in Festuca arundinacea roots. The process of phytoremediation of contaminated soil using F.arundinacea assisted with fertilization was monitored by means of toxicological tests: Microtox SPT (inhibition of the luminescence of V. fischeri), Ostracodtoxkit F (mort…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110409

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steliga, T., & Kluk, D.
Affiliations
Oil and Gas Institute - National Research Institute (PL)
Corresponding author
Steliga, Teresa
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
194
Pages
110409
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010074332
Cited by
133
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
tall fescue, phytoremediation, soil contamination, lead, nickel, cadmium, petroleum hydrocarbons, total petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metal translocation, fertilization, bioremediation, biodegradation, phytotoxicity, ecotoxicological tests, Microtox, Kahramanmaraş
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Petroleum, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Germination, Metals, Heavy, Lepidium sativum, Festuca

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review