Artificial intelligence models to predict acute phytotoxicity in petroleum contaminated soils
Abstract
Environment pollutants, especially those from total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), have a highly complex chemical, biological and physical impact on soils. Here we study this influence via modelling the TPH acute phytotoxicity effects on eleven samples of soils from Sakhalin island in greenhouse conditions. The soils were contaminated with crude oil in different doses ranging from the 3.0-100.0 g kg -1 . Measuring the Hordeum vulgare root elongation, the crucial ecotoxicity parameter, we have estimated. We have also investigated the contrast effect in different soils. To predict TPH phytotoxicity different machine learning models were used, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM). The models under discussion were proved to be valid using the mean absolute error method (MAE), the root mean square error method (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ). We have shown that ANN and SVR can successfully predict barley response based on soil chemical properties (pH, LOI, N, P, K, clay, TPH). The best achieved accuracy was as following: MAE - 8.44, RMSE -11.05, and R 2 -0.80.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ANN and SVM are advanced machine learning methods useful for environmental science because they give broad insights and make it easier to understand nonlinear data.
“Artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) are two examples of advanced machine learning methods that are useful for environmental science because they give broad insights and make it easier to understand nonlinear data [320].”
From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [320]
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit
Hahnloser, R. H. R., Sarpeshkar, R., Mahowald, M. A., Douglas, R. J., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016072 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qattan, S. Y. A. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01103-y · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shadrin, D., Pukalchik, M., Kovaleva, E., & Fedorov, M.
- Affiliations
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Shadrin, Dmitrii
- Pukalchik, Mariia
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 110410
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3009462837
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Russian Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- total petroleum hydrocarbons, crude oil contamination, soil phytotoxicity, barley, ecotoxicity prediction, artificial neural networks, support vector regression, soil chemical properties
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Hordeum, Hydrocarbons, Models, Theoretical, Petroleum, Russia, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants, Neural Networks, Computer, Islands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review