Cited by 39Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Artificial intelligence models to predict acute phytotoxicity in petroleum contaminated soils

Shadrin, Dmitrii, Pukalchik, Mariia, Kovaleva, Ekaterina, Fedorov, Maxim·2020·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Environment pollutants, especially those from total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), have a highly complex chemical, biological and physical impact on soils. Here we study this influence via modelling the TPH acute phytotoxicity effects on eleven samples of soils from Sakhalin island in greenhouse conditions. The soils were contaminated with crude oil in different doses ranging from the 3.0-100.0 g kg -1 . Measuring the Hordeum vulgare root elongation, the crucial ecotoxicity parameter, we have estimated. We have also investigated the contrast effect in different soils. To predict TPH phytotoxicity different machine learning models were used, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM). The models under discussion were proved to be valid using the mean absolute error method (MAE), the root mean square error method (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ). We have shown that ANN and SVR can successfully predict barley response based on soil chemical properties (pH, LOI, N, P, K, clay, TPH). The best achieved accuracy was as following: MAE - 8.44, RMSE -11.05, and R 2 -0.80.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110410

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shadrin, D., Pukalchik, M., Kovaleva, E., & Fedorov, M.
Affiliations
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Shadrin, Dmitrii
  • Pukalchik, Mariia
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
194
Pages
110410
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009462837
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
total petroleum hydrocarbons, crude oil contamination, soil phytotoxicity, barley, ecotoxicity prediction, artificial neural networks, support vector regression, soil chemical properties
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Hordeum, Hydrocarbons, Models, Theoretical, Petroleum, Russia, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants, Neural Networks, Computer, Islands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review