The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive plant identification based on social image data
Open accessAbstract
Speeding up the collection and integration of raw botanical observation data is a crucial step towards a sustainable development of agriculture and the conservation of biodiversity. Initiated in the context of a citizen sciences project, the main contribution of this paper is an innovative collaborative workflow focused on image-based plant identification as a mean to enlist new contributors and facilitate access to botanical data. Since 2010, hundreds of thousands of geo-tagged and dated plant photographs were collected and revised by hundreds of novice, amateur and expert botanists of a specialized social network. An image-based identification tool – available as both a web and a mobile application – is synchronized with that growing data and allows any user to query or enrich the system with new observations. An important originality is that it works with up to five different organs contrarily to previous approaches that mainly relied on the leaf. This allows querying the system at any period of the year and with complementary images composing a plant observation. Extensive experiments of the visual search engine as well as system-oriented and user-oriented evaluations of the application show that it is already very helpful to determine a plant among hundreds or thousands of species. At the time of writing, the whole framework covers about half of the plant species living in France (2200 species), which already makes it the widest existing automated identification tool (with its imperfections).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015 · cited 2×
“The 22 K English concepts of the WordNet ontology (Miller, 1995) were fi rst used as text queries in popular web image search engines (e.g. Google Image).”
MethodSpeeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557 · cited 1×
“For the fruit , leaf and bark view types, we use a concatenation of shape & texture local features, namely SURF features (Bay et al., 2008), EOH_8 (a 8-dimensional edge orientation histogram), HOUGH_4_4 (a 16-dimensional histogram of lines orientation and position), FOURIER_32 (a 32-dimensional…”
MethodAutomated Flower Classification over a Large Number of Classes
Nilsback, M.-E., & Zisserman, A. (2008) · 2008 Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icvgip.2008.47 · Cited by 3,442
Hamming Embedding and Weak Geometric Consistency for Large Scale Image Search
Jegou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_24 · Cited by 1,901
Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning
Le, Q. V. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639343 · Cited by 1,695
High-dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification
Sanchez, J., & Perronnin, F. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995504 · Cited by 272
Cited by
A computer vision for animal ecology
Weinstein, B. G. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12780 · Cited by 429
Evaluating the Forest Ecosystem through a Semi-Autonomous Quadruped Robot and a Hexacopter UAV
Idrissi, M., Hussain, A., Barua, B., Osman, A., Abozariba, R., Aneiba, A., & Asyhari, T. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22155497 · Cited by 25
Huang, H., Hwang, G., & Chen, P. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13177 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Joly, A., Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Bakić, V., Barbe, J., Selmi, S., Yahiaoui, I., Carré, J., Mouysset, E., Molino, J.-F., Boujemaa, N., & Barthélémy, D.
- Venue
- Ecological Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 22-34
- ISSN
- 1574-9541 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012358566
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive plant identification based on social image data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.07.006
- The paper
- Joly, A., Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Bakić, V., Barbe, J., Selmi, S., Yahiaoui, I., Carré, J., Mouysset, E., Molino, J.-F., Boujemaa, N., & Barthélémy, D. (2014). Interactive plant identification based on social image data. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.