The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis
Abstract
In recent years there have been a number of attempts to develop a more comprehensive approach to the issue of measuring resource use and/or pollution generation embodied in trade flows, including contributions that combine input–output techniques and Ecological Footprint analysis. In this two-part paper we describe how to enumerate the resource and/or pollution content of inter-regional and inter-national trade flows (Part 1) and we present a literature review of recent methodological and empirical developments (Part 2). It is straightforward in principle to extend the basic input–output approach to capture international trade flows. However, in practice, problems of data availability and compatibility, and of computability of extended input–output matrices, mean that simplifying assumptions are generally applied, but with the implications of these assumptions often not made fully explicit. What appears to be absent from previous applications is an account of the analytical method by which Ecological Footprints should ideally be estimated in an international input–output accounting analysis. This allows an explicit analysis of the problems that prevent the application of the full method and identification of the most appropriate short-cut methods in a transparent way. The objective of this paper is to provide such an account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Input-output analysis foundations and extensions
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009) · Cited by 5,083
Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth
Bazan, G. (1997) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g31710273 · Cited by 4,654
Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach
Leontief, W. (1970) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926294 · Cited by 1,959
Environmental Repercussions And The Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach
Leontief, W. (2018) · Green Accounting · doi:10.4324/9781315197715-18 · Cited by 1,506
Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base
Dimaranan, B., & McDougall, R. A. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,124
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003 · Cited by 697
Self-citationMonfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.009 · Cited by 558
CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility?
Munksgaard, J., & Pedersen, K. A. (2001) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00120-8 · Cited by 548
Lenzen, M. (1998) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(98)00012-3 · Cited by 470
Self-citationA modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia
Lenzen, M., & Murray, S. A. (2001) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00275-5 · Cited by 432
Self-citationCO2Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models
Lenzen, M., Pade, L.-L., & Munksgaard, J. (2004) · Economic Systems Research · doi:10.1080/0953531042000304272 · Cited by 428
Self-citationAllocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis
Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.012 · Cited by 420
Self-citationNew methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy
Bicknell, K., Ball, R. J., Ross Cullen, B., & Bigsby, H. R. (1998) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00136-5 · Cited by 372
The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products
Wyckoff, A. W., & Roop, J. M. (1994) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(94)90158-9 · Cited by 354
The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions
Bastianoni, S., Pulselli, F. M., & Tiezzi, E. (2004) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.018 · Cited by 288
National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method
Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D. D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., & Murray, M. D. (2005) · Cited by 254
Hubacek, K., & Giljum, S. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00257-4 · Cited by 240
The OECD Input-Output Database: 2006 Edition
(2006) · OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers · doi:10.1787/308077407044 · Cited by 232
Ferng, J.-J. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00104-6 · Cited by 214
Ecological Footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions
McDonald, G. W., & Patterson, M. G. (2004) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.008 · Cited by 208
Physical and monetary input–output analysis: What makes the difference?
Weisz, H., & Duchin, F. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.011 · Cited by 198
The Importance of Imports for Household Environmental Impacts
Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.89 · Cited by 156
International trade and the sustainability footprint: a practical criterion for its assessment
Proops, J. L. R., Atkinson, G., a, B. F. V. S., & Simon, S. (1999) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00030-5 · Cited by 144
On the conversion between local and global hectares in Ecological Footprint analysis
Wiedmann, T., & Lenzen, M. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.018 · Cited by 99
Self-citationThe embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports
Schaeffer, R., & de Sá, A. (1996) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/0196-8904(95)00283-9 · Cited by 99
Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2009) · Cited by 34
Treading lightly: Ecofootprints of New Zealand's ageing population
McDonald, G. W., Forgie, V., & Macgregor, C. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.019 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis
Hertwich, E. G., & Peters, G. P. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es803496a · Cited by 1,715
From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories
Peters, G. P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014 · Cited by 1,162
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003 · Cited by 697
Self-citationGlobal Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis
Wood, R., Stadler, K., Bulavskaya, T., Lutter, S., Giljum, S., De Koning, A., Kuenen, J., Schütz, H., Acosta-Fernández, J., Usubiaga, A., et al. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010138 · Cited by 414
Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H. C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S., & Palm, V. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.014 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, K., Lenzen, M., Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-44
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071868072
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 22.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
