The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyzes the impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in developing countries. In this study we treat population as a predictor in the model, instead of assuming a unitary elasticity of emissions with respect to population growth. We contribute to the existing literature by examining the effect of urbanization, taking into account the presence of heterogeneity in the sample of countries and testing for the stability of the estimated elasticities over time. The sample covers the period from 1975 through 2005 for different groups of countries, classified according to their income levels. Our results show that, whereas the impact of population growth on emissions is above unity and only slightly different for upper, middle, and low-income countries, additional demographic variables, namely, urbanization, demonstrate a very different impact on emissions for low and lower-middle-income countries and upper-middle income countries. For the first set of countries, the elasticity, emission-urbanization, is higher than unity, whereas in the second group, the elasticity is 0.72, which is in accordance with the higher environmental impact observed in less developed regions. However, in upper-middle income countries and highly developed countries, the elasticity, emission-urbanization, is negative. The heterogeneous impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions should therefore be taken into account in future discussions of climate change policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Unit root tests for panel data
Choi, I. (2001) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6 · Cited by 4,113
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Stern, D. I. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 4,013
Shi, A. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00223-9 · Cited by 671
Cited by
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064 · Cited by 1,127
Shahbaz, M., Kumar Tiwari, A., & Nasir, M. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006 · Cited by 873
Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Pakistan
Khan, M. K., Teng, J.-Z., Khan, M. I., & Khan, M. O. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.065 · Cited by 561
Dong, F., Wang, Y., Su, B., Hua, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.010 · Cited by 359
Kais, S., & Sami, H. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.054 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Maruotti, A.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1344-1353
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123971221
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 57.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009
- The paper
- Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Maruotti, A. (2011). The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.