Carbon pricing of basic materials: Incentives and risks for the value chain and consumers
Open accessAbstract
Different options for a reform of the EU Emissions Trading System are discussed to ensure carbon price incentives for mitigation options in the basic materials sector, while minimizing carbon leakage risks. This paper quantifies carbon leakage risks, distributional implications, and additional revenues associated with an import-only border carbon adjustment (BCA), a symmetric (import and export) BCA, and an excise for embodied emissions at a fixed benchmark level in combination with continued free allocation. We estimate the product-level carbon intensities for 4400 commodity groups, compute maximal implied price changes due to full carbon pricing, and calculate cost increases relative to gross value added to assess the scale of carbon leakage risks. We show, first, that around 10% of EU exports and 5% of all domestic manufacturing sales meet the criteria for carbon leakage risk under an incomplete BCA at a carbon price of 30 EUR/t. Second, the distributional implications of consistent carbon pricing of basic materials are small and progressive. Finally, an excise could generate revenues of around 20 billion euros that may be used towards climate action. Our results on potential carbon leakage risks and their mitigation can inform responsible policy making to shape the EU pathway towards climate neutrality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent economic research suggests that intensity-based rebates could offer similar protection against leakage and competitiveness losses for EITE industries while lowering the carbon price needed to achieve a given level of emissions reductions.
“Recent economic research suggests that intensity-based rebates could offer similar protection against leakage and competitiveness losses for EITE industries while lowering the carbon price needed to achieve a given level of emissions reductions 86 .”
From Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
A meta-analysis finds that without export rebates, even at a carbon price of €30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk.
“A meta-analysis (101) finds that without such export rebates, even at a carbon price of € 30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk (80, 91).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
All of these options could, in principle, create incentives for efficient material choice, use, and recycling and also generate revenue for low-carbon innovation and infrastructure.
“All of these could, in principle, create incentives for efficient material choice, use, and recycling and also generate revenue for low-carbon innovation and infrastructure (91, 92).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Stede, J., Pauliuk, S., Hardadi, G., & Neuhoff, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Stede, Jan
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 189
- Pages
- 107168
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3189351480
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
- EIT Climate-KIC
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- carbon pricing, carbon leakage, basic materials sector, border carbon adjustment, distributional effects, climate neutrality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review