Cited by 31Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEU Law and Policy AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Carbon pricing of basic materials: Incentives and risks for the value chain and consumers

Open access
Stede, Jan, Pauliuk, Stefan, Hardadi, Gilang, Neuhoff, Karsten·2021·Ecological Economics

Abstract

Different options for a reform of the EU Emissions Trading System are discussed to ensure carbon price incentives for mitigation options in the basic materials sector, while minimizing carbon leakage risks. This paper quantifies carbon leakage risks, distributional implications, and additional revenues associated with an import-only border carbon adjustment (BCA), a symmetric (import and export) BCA, and an excise for embodied emissions at a fixed benchmark level in combination with continued free allocation. We estimate the product-level carbon intensities for 4400 commodity groups, compute maximal implied price changes due to full carbon pricing, and calculate cost increases relative to gross value added to assess the scale of carbon leakage risks. We show, first, that around 10% of EU exports and 5% of all domestic manufacturing sales meet the criteria for carbon leakage risk under an incomplete BCA at a carbon price of 30 EUR/t. Second, the distributional implications of consistent carbon pricing of basic materials are small and progressive. Finally, an excise could generate revenues of around 20 billion euros that may be used towards climate action. Our results on potential carbon leakage risks and their mitigation can inform responsible policy making to shape the EU pathway towards climate neutrality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent economic research suggests that intensity-based rebates could offer similar protection against leakage and competitiveness losses for EITE industries while lowering the carbon price needed to achieve a given level of emissions reductions.

    “Recent economic research suggests that intensity-based rebates could offer similar protection against leakage and competitiveness losses for EITE industries while lowering the carbon price needed to achieve a given level of emissions reductions 86 .”
  • A meta-analysis finds that without export rebates, even at a carbon price of €30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk.

    “A meta-analysis (101) finds that without such export rebates, even at a carbon price of € 30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk (80, 91).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [91]

  • All of these options could, in principle, create incentives for efficient material choice, use, and recycling and also generate revenue for low-carbon innovation and infrastructure.

    “All of these could, in principle, create incentives for efficient material choice, use, and recycling and also generate revenue for low-carbon innovation and infrastructure (91, 92).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [91]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 31

Authors
Stede, J., Pauliuk, S., Hardadi, G., & Neuhoff, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Stede, Jan
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
189
Pages
107168
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189351480
Cited by
31
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • EIT Climate-KIC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
carbon pricing, carbon leakage, basic materials sector, border carbon adjustment, distributional effects, climate neutrality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review