The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There are some articles that try to evaluate waste governance performance by developing respective indicator systems 28 -30 . However, these concepts center on overall system assessment only, which demands the provision of feasible measures, especially the measures developed from stakeholders ' perspective, for the improvement of waste governance practices.”
From Characterizing the polycentricity in waste governance: a comparative study on Shanghai, Tokyo, and Hong Kong (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Blanchet, 2012, Selection of sustainability indicators for health services in challenging environments: balancing scientific approach with political engagement, Evaluation and Program Planning
- Böhringer, 2007, Measuring the immeasurable – a survey of sustainability indices, Ecological Economics, 63, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Coelho, 2012, Proposal of an environmental performance index to assess solid waste treatment technologies, Waste Management, 32, 1473, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.001 · DOI
- Colona, 2006, Community-based household waste management: lessons learnt from EXNORA's ‘zero waste management’ scheme in two South Indian cities, Habitat International, 30, 916, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.04.006 · DOI
- Dahl, 2012, Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability, Ecological Indicators, 17, 14, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032 · DOI
- Hak, 2012, A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic's sustainable development strategy, Ecological Indicators, 17, 46, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.034 · DOI
- Hezri, 2006, Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: issues for ecological economics, Ecological Economics, 60, 86, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.019 · DOI
- Hezri, 2004, Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia, Ecological Indicators, 4, 287, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2004.08.002 · DOI
- Huang, 1998, A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability, Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 15, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00054-1 · DOI
- Klundert, A.v.D., 1999. Integrated sustainable waste management: the selection of appropriate technologies and the design of sustainable systems is not (only) a technical issue. Paper prepared for the CEDARE/IETC Inter-Regional Workshop on Technologies for Sustainable Waste Management, held 13–15 July 1999 in Alexandria, Egypt.
- Milman, 2008, Incorporating resilience into sustainability indicators: an example for the urban water sector, Global Environmental Change, 18, 758, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002 · DOI
- Mori, 2012, Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI), Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001 · DOI
- Ochoa, 2011, The application of urban sustainability indicators: a comparison between various practices, Habitat International, 35, 17, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006 · DOI
- Passarini, 2011, Indicators of waste management efficiency related to different territorial conditions, Waste Management, 31, 785, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.021 · DOI
- Rinne, 2012, From sustainability to well-being: lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level, Ecological Indicators
- Rojas, 2011, The ‘measurement of economic performance and social progress’ report and quality of life: moving forward, Social Indicators Research, 102, 169, 10.1007/s11205-010-9737-x · DOI
- Shields, 2002, The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability, Ecological Indicators, 2, 149, 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00042-0 · DOI
- Snyman, 2010, Towards zero waste: a case study in the City of Tshwane, Waste Management & Research
- Torras, 2008, The subjectivity inherent in objective measures of well-being, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 475, 10.1007/s10902-007-9084-z · DOI
- Trois, 2008, Towards zero waste in emerging countries – a South African experience, Waste Management, 28, 1480, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.006 · DOI
- Tsai, 2010, Energy sustainability from analysis of sustainable development indicators: a case study in Taiwan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2131, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.027 · DOI
- Viguri, 2012, Material flow indicators and carbon footprint for MSW management systems: analysis and application at regional level, Cantabria, Spain, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 68, 54, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.007 · DOI
- Vivanco, 2012, Building waste management core indicators through spatial material flow analysis: net recovery and transport intensity indexes, Waste Management, 32, 2496, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.06.010 · DOI
- Wilson, 2007, Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics, Ecological Indicators, 7, 299, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.02.009 · DOI
- Wilts, 2012, National waste prevention programs: indicators on progress and barriers, Waste Management & Research, 30
- Yuan, 2013, Key indicators for assessing the effectiveness of waste management in construction projects, Ecological Indicators, 24, 476, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.022 · DOI
- Zaman, 2011, Urban growth and waste management optimization towards “zero waste city.”, City Culture and Society, 2, 177, 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.11.007 · DOI
- Zaman, 2013, The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues
Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Msigwa, G., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6 · Cited by 835
Hao, X., Dong, L., Qian, X., Benjamin, S., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, X., Ma, W., Li, J., Tong, X., et al. (2024) · npj Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s42949-024-00179-4 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaman, A. U.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 682-693
- ISSN
- 1470-160X
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
