Cited by 243Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: a meta-analysis

Kail, Jochem, Brabec, Karel, Poppe, Michaela, Januschke, Kathrin·2015·Ecological Indicators

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in the recovery trajectories of abiotic and biotic indices caused by various restoration measures are still understudied and remain unclear due to a general lack of long-term monitoring data, especially in large geographical settings and lotic ecosystems.

    “However, changes in the recovery trajectories of abiotic and biotic indices caused by various restoration measures are still under­ studied in the literature and remain unclear due to a general lack of long-term monitoring data to understand restoration effects over time (Kail et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2019), especially within large geographical settings and in lotic ecosystems.”
  • Many factors (e.g., organism group, restoration measures) can contribute to the different variability range of response ratio.

    “and indicated that many factors (e.g., organism group, restoration measures) can contribute to the different variability range of response ratio.”
  • High variability of the response ratio of fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes after river restoration was reported.

    “Kail et al. (2015) also reported the high variability of the response ratio of fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes after river restoration (without incorporation with abiotic indices)”
  • Restoration effects could gradually vanish over time unless careful monitoring of changes is used to inform further restoration maintenance.

    “However, in some situations, restoration effects could gradually vanish over time unless careful monitoring of changes is used to inform further restoration maintenance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kail, J., Brabec, K., Poppe, M., & Januschke, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
  • BOKU University (AT)
Corresponding author
Kail, Jochem
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
58
Pages
311-321
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W805469072
Cited by
243
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
Funders
EU
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
river restoration, fish, macroinvertebrates, aquatic macrophytes, river widening, agricultural land use, river width, long-term monitoring, adaptive management, catchment characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review