The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality
Open accessAbstract
The water quality index (WQI) model is a popular tool for evaluating surface water quality. It uses aggregation techniques that allow conversion of extensive water quality data into a single value or index. Globally, the WQI model has been applied to evaluate water quality (surface water and groundwater) based on local water quality criteria. Since its development in the 1960s, it has become a popular tool due to its generalised structure and ease-of-use. Commonly, WQI models involve four consecutive stages; these are (1) selection of the water quality parameters, (2) generation of sub-indices for each parameter (3) calculation of the parameter weighting values, and (4) aggregation of sub-indices to compute the overall water quality index. Several researchers have utilized a range of applications of WQI models to evaluate the water quality of rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and estuaries. Some problems of the WQI model are that they are usually developed based on site-specific guidelines for a particular region, and are therefore not generic. Moreover, they produce uncertainty in the conversion of large amounts of water quality data into a single index. This paper presents a comparative discussion of the most commonly used WQI models, including the different model structures, components, and applications. Particular focus is placed on parameterization of the models, the techniques used to determine the sub-indices, parameter weighting values, index aggregation functions and the sources of uncertainty. Issues affecting model accuracy are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A triple increase in global river basins with water scarcity due to future pollution
Wang, M., Bodirsky, B. L., Rijneveld, R., Beier, F., Bak, M. P., Batool, M., Droppers, B., Popp, A., van Vliet, M. T. H., & Strokal, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44947-3 · Cited by 508
A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): history, models, attempts and perspectives
Chidiac, S., El Najjar, P., Ouaini, N., El Rayess, Y., & El Azzi, D. (2023) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-023-09650-7 · Cited by 503
Machine learning in natural and engineered water systems
Huang, R., Ma, C., Ma, J., Huangfu, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117666 · Cited by 319
Kouadri, S., Elbeltagi, A., Islam, A. R. M. T., & Kateb, S. (2021) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-021-01528-9 · Cited by 283
GIS-Based Evaluation of Pollution Sources and Water Quality Status in the Turag River, Bangladesh
Rony, M. M. H., Islam, M. T., Muyen, Z., Godhuli, M., Sultana, M. N., & Adham, A. K. M. (2025) · The Global Environmental Engineers · doi:10.15377/2410-3624.2025.12.2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Uddin, M. G., Nash, S., & Olbert, A. I.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 107218
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3113372098
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218
- The paper
- Uddin, M. G., Nash, S., & Olbert, A. I. (2021). A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.