Cited by 32Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The outbreak pattern of SARS cases in China as revealed by a mathematical model

Open access
Zhang, Zhibin·2007·Ecological Modelling

Abstract

Since it first appeared in China's Guangdong Province, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) has caused serious damages to many parts of the world, especially Asia. Little is known about its epidemiology. We developed a modified discrete SIR model including susceptible individuals, non-hospitalized SARS persons; hospitalized patients, cured hospital patients, and those who have died due to SARS infection. Here, we demonstrate the effective reproduction number is determined by infection rates and infectious period of hospitalized and non-hospitalized SARS patients. Both infection rate and the effective reproductive number of the SARS virus are significantly negatively correlated with the total number of cumulative cases, indicating that the control measures implemented in China are effective, and the outbreak pattern of accumulative SARS cases in China is a logistic growth curve. We estimate the basic reproduction number R0 of SARS virus is 2.87 in mainland of China, very close to the estimations in Singapore and Hong Kong.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.01.020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Monteriro, L.H.A., Sasso, J.B., Beilinck J.G.C., 2006b. Continous and discrete approached to the epidemiology of viral spreading in populations taking into account the delay of incubation time. Ecol. Model., doi:10.1016/j.ecomodel.2006.09.27. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhibin
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
204
Issue
3-4
Pages
420-426
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105948957
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
SARS, outbreak patterns, basic reproduction number, SIR model, logistic curve, infectious period, infection rate, epidemic control measures, hospitalized patients, cumulative cases, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review