The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Forest ecosystem dynamics emerges from nonlinear interactions between adaptive biotic agents (i.e., individual trees) and their relationship with a spatially and temporally heterogeneous abiotic environment. Understanding and predicting the dynamics resulting from these complex interactions is crucial for the sustainable stewardship of ecosystems, particularly in the context of rapidly changing environmental conditions. Here we present iLand (the individual-based forest landscape and disturbance model), a novel approach to simulating forest dynamics as an emergent property of environmental drivers, ecosystem processes and dynamic interactions across scales. Our specific objectives were (i) to describe the model, in particular its novel approach to simulate spatially explicit individual-tree competition for resources over large scales within a process-based framework of physiological resource use, and (ii) to present a suite of evaluation experiments assessing iLands ability to simulate tree growth and mortality for a wide range of forest ecosystems. Adopting an approach rooted in ecological field theory, iLand calculates a continuous field of light availability over the landscape, with every tree represented by a mechanistically derived, size- and species-dependent pattern of light interference. Within a hierarchical multi-scale framework productivity is derived at stand-level by means of a light-use efficiency approach, and downscaled to individuals via local light availability. Allocation (based on allometric ratios) and mortality (resulting from carbon starvation) are modeled at the individual-tree level, accounting for adaptive behavior of trees in response to their environment. To evaluate the model we conducted simulations over the extended environmental gradient of a longitudinal transect in Oregon, USA, and successfully compared results against independently observed productivity estimates (63.4% of variation explained) and mortality patterns in even-aged stands. This transect experiment was furthermore replicated for a different set of species and ecosystems in the Austrian Alps, documenting the robustness and generality of our approach. Model performance was also successfully evaluated for structurally and compositionally complex old-growth forests in the western Cascades of Oregon. Finally, the ability of our approach to address forest ecosystem dynamics at landscape scales was demonstrated by a computational scaling experiment. In simulating the emergence of ecosystem patterns and dynamics as a result of complex process interactions across scales our approach has the potential to contribute crucial capacities to understanding and fostering forest ecosystem resilience under changing climatic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
(2002) · Cited by 3,806
Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems
Price, M. F. (2003) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00041-7 · Cited by 3,293
Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems
Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., Kremer, A., Barbati, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Seidl, R., Delzon, S., Corona, P., Kolström, M., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023 · Cited by 2,284
Self-citationPattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology
Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., Thulke, H.-H., Weiner, J., Wiegand, T., & DeAngelis, D. L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116681 · Cited by 2,175
Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties
Grime, J. P. (2001) · Cited by 2,087
Individual-based Modeling and Ecology
Grimm, V., & Railsback, S. F. (2005) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400850624 · Cited by 1,940
Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington
Franklin, J. F., & Dyrness, C. T. (1988) · Cited by 1,921
Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., & Ginn, T. R. (1984) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr020i006p00682 · Cited by 1,655
Landsberg, J. J., & Waring, R. H. (1997) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00026-1 · Cited by 1,587
Cited by
An overview of agent-based models in plant biology and ecology
Zhang, B., & DeAngelis, D. L. (2020) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcaa043 · Cited by 93
Disentangling the effects of compositional and structural diversity on forest productivity
Silva Pedro, M., Rammer, W., & Seidl, R. (2017) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/jvs.12505 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Scheller, R. M., & Spies, T. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 231
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132576438
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.015
- The paper
- Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Scheller, R. M., & Spies, T. A. (2012). An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.