Cited by 34Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisCognitive Science and MappingAgriculture and Rural Development Research

A new approach for comparing and categorizing farmers’ systems of practice based on cognitive mapping and graph theory indicators

Vanwindekens, Frédéric M., Baret, Philippe V., Stilmant, Didier·2014·Ecological Modelling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanwindekens, F. M., Baret, P. V., & Stilmant, D.
Affiliations
  • Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanwindekens, Frédéric M.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
274
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981977227
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Keywords
cognitive mapping, grassland management, livestock grazing, forage management, social-ecological systems, farm diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review