The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management
Open accessAbstract
Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) models are easier to construct and use compared to most other ecosystem modelling techniques and are therefore more widely used by more scientists and managers. This, however, creates a problem with quality assurance; to address this we provide an overview of best practices for creating Ecopath models. We describe the diagnostics that can be used to check for thermodynamic and ecological principles, and highlight principles that should be used for balancing a model. We then highlight the pitfalls when comparing Ecopath models using Ecological Network Analysis indices. For dynamic simulations in Ecosim we show the state of the art in calibrating the model by fitting it to time series using a formal fitting procedure and statistical goodness of fit. Finally, we show how Monte Carlo simulations can be used to address uncertainty in input parameters, and we discuss the use of models in a management context, specifically using the concept of ‘key runs’ for ecosystem-based management. This novel list of best practices for EwE models will enable ecosystem managers to evaluate the goodness of fit of the given EwE model to the ecosystem management question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Q/B was reduced, and the P/B was increased for fish so that the P/Q ratio was near 0.2–0.3 based on EwE best practices [74, 75].”
From Modelling microplastic bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential in the Galápagos penguin ecosystem using Ecopath and Ecosim (EwE) with Ecotracer (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 · Cited by 11,648
The Ecological Implications of Body Size
Peters, R. H. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608551 · Cited by 5,757
The Strategy of Ecosystem Development
Odum, E. P. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.262 · Cited by 5,546
The Ecological Role of Water-Column Microbes in the Sea
Azam, F., Fenchel, T., Field, J., Gray, J. S., Meyer-Reil, L., & Thingstad, T. F. (1983) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps010257 · Cited by 5,398
Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. (1992) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/bf00042883 · Cited by 3,481
Self-citationPauly, D. F. (1980) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175 · Cited by 2,876
Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology
Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W., Railsback, S., Thulke, H., Weiner, J., Wiegand, T., & DeAngelis, D. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116681 · Cited by 2,314
Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations
Christensen, V., & Walters, C. J. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.003 · Cited by 1,914
Self-citationChristensen, V., & Pauly, D. (1992) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90016-8 · Cited by 1,347
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Christensen, 2000, Ecopath with ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Pages 79–105
- Coll, 2014, New software plug-in to calculate biodiversity and conservation-based indicators from EwE food web models. Pages 67–68
- Heymans, 2005, Ecosystem model of the Western and Central Aleutian Islands in 1963, 1979 and 1991. Pages 8–82
- Lucey, 2014, Improving the EBFM toolbox with an alternative open source mass balance model. Pages 204–205
- Prato, 2014, Towards a balance between complexity and feasibility in food-web models of Mediterranean coastal ecosystems: addressing uncertainty while accounting for data collection constraints, Fish. Centre Res. Rep., 22, 70
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McMullen, K., Vargas, F. H., Calle, P., Alavarado-Cadena, O., Pakhomov, E. A., & Alava, J. J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296788 · Cited by 46
“The Q/B was reduced, and the P/B was increased for fish so that the P/Q ratio was near 0.2–0.3 based on EwE best practices [74, 75].”
MethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Heymans, J. J., Coll, M., Link, J. S., Mackinson, S., Steenbeek, J., Walters, C., & Christensen, V.
- Affiliations
- Scottish Association For Marine Science (GB)
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
- Ecopath International Initiative (ES)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Heymans, Johanna Jacomina
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 331
- Pages
- 173-184
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2286380963
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 26.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government (NE/L003279/1, EU FP7 GAP2, M1228, 266544)
- Natural Environment Research Council
- European Commission
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2014-05782)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- Ecopath with Ecosim, food web models, ecosystem-based management, model calibration, model diagnostics, thermodynamic principles, ecological network analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, parameter uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
