Denying loan access: The student-level consequences when community colleges opt out of the Stafford loan program
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student loans generally improve outcomes for U.S. community college students.
“Marx and Turner's (2019) RCT results are in line with other RCT and quasi-experimental evidence that student loans generally improve outcomes for U.S. community college students.”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Wiederspan, 2016
For U.S. community college students, access to federal loans led to increased enrollment intensity and persistence, conditional on initial enrollment.
“earlier quasi-experimental studies that used institution-year level variation in whether or not community colleges offer access to federal loans and found that loan access led to increased enrollment intensity and persistence, conditional on initial enrollment (Dunlop, 2013;Wiederspan, 2016).”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Wiederspan, 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Wiederspan, M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wiederspan, Mark
- ORCID
- Wiederspan, Mark
- Venue
- Economics of Education Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 79-96
- ISSN
- 0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2398045506
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 34.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
- Keywords
- federal student loans, community colleges, student loans, Pell Grant eligibility, student loan default, college completion, course-taking patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
