Abstract readability: Evidence from top-5 economics journals
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Flesch-Kincaid score has been widely used as a proxy for textual readability in prior research.
“In prior research (Berninger et al., 2021;Rodriguez et al., 2024), this metric has been widely used as a proxy for textual readability.”
From Do Research Topics and Abstract Readability Affect Citation Impact in Leading Finance Journals? (2025) · cites this paper as Rodriguez et al., 2024
Academic paper quality may be shaped by readability.
“Academic paper quality may also be shaped by readability (Rodriguez et al., 2024).”
From Do Research Topics and Abstract Readability Affect Citation Impact in Leading Finance Journals? (2025) · cites this paper as Rodriguez et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do Research Topics and Abstract Readability Affect Citation Impact in Leading Finance Journals?
Luo, Z., & Tse, Y. (2025) · Applied Finance Letters · doi:10.24135/afl.v14i.1059
- Authors
- Rodriguez, B., Huynh, K. P., Jacho-Chávez, D. T., & Sánchez-Aragón, L.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Bank of Canada (CA)
- Venue
- Economics Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 235
- Pages
- 111541
- ISSN
- 0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390755790
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text Readability and Simplification
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- readability, abstracts, economics journals, women in academia, author gender, research accessibility, academic writing, gender gap in publishing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review