Cited by 5scientometrics and bibliometrics researchText Readability and SimplificationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Abstract readability: Evidence from top-5 economics journals

Rodriguez, Belicia, Huynh, Kim P., Jacho-Chávez, David T., Sánchez-Aragón, Leonardo·2024·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Rodriguez, B., Huynh, K. P., Jacho-Chávez, D. T., & Sánchez-Aragón, L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Bank of Canada (CA)
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
235
Pages
111541
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390755790
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text Readability and Simplification
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
readability, abstracts, economics journals, women in academia, author gender, research accessibility, academic writing, gender gap in publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review