Emerging ecosystem services governance issues in the Belgium ecosystem services community of practice
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ES tool is increasingly used to support decision making on sustainability issues, including in contexts of agroecological transitions.
“The tool is increasingly used to support decision making on sustainability issues [28], including in contexts of agroecological transitions [29].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Citation [28] supports the decision-making part of the sentence, not the agroecological-transitions clause, which has a separate citation. Section 3.1 says the Belgian ES projects aim to provide policy-relevant knowledge or solutions, and the Conclusions describe a gradual shift toward policy relevance. But the Conclusions also say many projects remain focused on scientific challenges; the paper does not establish that the ES tool is increasingly used in sustainability decision-making. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Haines-Young, R., 2011. Exploring ecosystem services issues across diverse knowl- edge domain using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35 (5), 685-704.
- Keune, H., et al., 2013a. The governance potential of ecosystem services research in Belgium. In: Paper 1st Interdisciplinary Symposium on Sustainable Develop- ment. Which transition for Our Societies? Conference Theme: The Role of Public Authorities in the Transition 31st January and 1st February 2013, Namur, Belgium, pp. 73-87. 〈http://www.beescommunity.be/en/publications/〉.
- Kitthananan, A., 2006. Conceptualizing governance: a review. J. Soc. Soc. Policy 5 (3), 1-19.
- Lee M. (2003), Conceptualizing the New Governance: A New Institution of Social Co- ordination, Paper presented at the Institutional Analysis and Development Mini-Conference, May 3rd and 5th, 2003, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
- Authors
- Keune, H., Dendoncker, N., Popa, F., Sander, J., Kampelmann, S., Boeraeve, F., Dufrêne, M., Bauler, T., Casaer, J., Cerulus, T., De Blust, G., Denayer, B., Janssens, L., Liekens, I., Panis, J., Scheppers, T., Simoens, I., Staes, J., Turkelboom, F., Ulenaers, P., Van der Biest, K., & Verboven, J.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest (BE)
- University of Namur (BE)
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- University of Liège (BE)
- Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos (BE)
- Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Flemish Government (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Keune, Hans
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecosystem Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 212-219
- ISSN
- 2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W863322470
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- ecosystem services governance, transdisciplinary research, decision support methodology, bottom-up approach, stakeholder engagement, role of science, Belgium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
